Hiya, since the footpath runs parallel with a road you can use the "pavement" preset in the editor - and the node where crossing the main road can be more specific by setting it as an "unmarked crossing", I have fixed these up in changeset/174232911

Hiya, when drawing outlines that should have 90-degree corners, you can use the "square corners" button in the editor (q) to prettify the areas, I have fixed up the ones you created in changeset/174232911

Hiya, since the footpath runs parallel with a road you can use the "pavement" preset in the editor - and the node where crossing the main road can be more specific by setting it as an "unmarked crossing"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174188391

The building is meant to be joined with adjacent buildings, you should not have separated it when attempting to fix the intersection. I recommend you also square corners where appropriate, as the quality has been degraded
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977879

Hi, there is no road here. What is your actual source?
The netball courts were only resurfaced a few years ago, there is nothing on the DCS NSW maps.
I am removing this road.

Hi - their website does not list an address and it does not seem this is a physical store? If it's a private residence it must not be mapped as a shop.

Were the refs on traffic lights meant to be removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152671037

Hi & welcome!

When drawing buildings it's recommended to use the "square corners" feature (Q on the web editor) so they draw with near 90 degree corners. (Obviously some buildings don't follow this, but most do)

For address tags, you only need the street name & house numbers as the rest can be implied from their location. (The extra tags aren't wrong, just unnecessary)

I also note that one of your buildings isn't labelled as one, it's just an area (way/1280972353)

Hi - we can't use Google maps (or street view) as a source for OSM, if that's what you're implying you used in your changeset comment.
However, I have verified on the street that it does say "Place". I will update the other parts of this street that you missed.

Thanks! I've updated the access tag for cars to be more correct & prevent vehicle routing. Foot & bicycle are still "yes"

Hi - please see this section about the footway=sidewalk tag for use in Australia:
osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Footpaths_(Sidewalks)

Hi, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
All of your recent changesets in the area use the same comment and are therefore meaningless.

Hi, you accidentally removed the highway tag from Anna Place

Hi - this intersection is still closed given the construction work opposite. North side can go straight on. South side cannot pass onto north side. (Maxar has latest imagery with orange barriers)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123108947

Howdy - Instead of just deleting, you could have split the way and marked the deleted part as a private unnamed driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122196327

Sounds good :)

Why did you delete the residential area?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121271680

You labelled way/1060226297 as a house when it's actually a pool, FYI

PS, you really only need addr:housenumber and addr:street as the other addr:* fields can be inferred from the encompassing suburb relation
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121007199

No worries

Partially reverted in 121002015 to bring back the suburb label as a member of the relation
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120978931