are these in 3dep yet? been waiting for more coverage south of Yosemite
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141876877

did Canyon Express move? the prior way followed what I see in Bing as well as recent Strava data

should the wiki tags be moved as well?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141574820

unless the pass is actually named Unnamed Pass the standard is to remove the name tag entirely. it will still render properly in Caltopo and OSM
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140914204

unless the pass is actually named Unnamed Pass the standard is to remove the name tag entirely. it will still render properly in Caltopo and OSM
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140914204

looks like these didn't get the GNISID value retained in gnis:feature_id, for example node/4065344346 is
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140390872

please use the alt_name tag instead of deleting the old name. Steeves Pass is the name in Ropers book. I don’t care which is used as the primary name, just that both names are retained.

"natural=XC Pass" isn't a commonly used tag, for cross country passes use "natural=saddle". if the pass carries a highway, like a hiking trail, then it can also be tagged with "mountain_pass=yes".

the location also appeared to be slightly off.

I've fixed both of these issues in changeset/139448208

thanks for the contribution!

no need to name these pois unless they have a name, can you remove the name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138733489

why do you believe this road to be a secondary? you've upgraded it from unclassified, to tertiary, to secondary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138166004

old proposed roads and fully destroyed roads don’t belong here, please remove them and add them to https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ (or some other site) instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138165711

this used to be an old trail that was still serviceable as a use trail.. has it been destroyed in recent times?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137616362

please use better statewide references before upgrading all of the road tags, Tioga Pass Road for example is secondary
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137213677

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=12&lat=37.3207&lon=-119.1773 can also help highlight problems in the map

these are not link roads nor secondary, please read osm.wiki/Highway_link and highway=unclassified

trail updates around the GTW and eastern Sequoia, added bridge details, Volcano Falls and a few more buildings

if it's a name that would be used on an mailing address then `name` is fine... otherwise I'd use `loc_name` or maybe `alt_name` depending on how common it is. just something like `loc_name=The Four Lane` without quotes should be good. the road number is pulled from the `ref` tag so you don't need to add it again

when a creek runs under a road add a culvert to the creek instead of creating a bridge on the road. unless there really is a bridge.

there is no need to add the number of lanes to the road name. the lanes=4 tag already covers this. thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635084

are the marked ford=yes nodes actually fords? the NHD flowlines around the Sierras are not super accurate, and most (say 95-99%) of the notable ones have culverts or bridges
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134434061

grocery stores need not be added to hiking routes, even if they are nearby. take a look at osm.wiki/Hiking#Roles for common hiking relation roles.