You tagged both of these ways as having 8 lanes each(16 lanes total). On satellite imagery I counted 10 lanes. Map renderers that support displaying lanes will have this area showing a total mess. So either each lane needs to be mapped as a separate way or there should be only 1 way with the correct number for "lanes=" tag.

"url=" is an ambiguous tag with various meanings. Perhaps you meant "website=" tag? If so, then it's intended for official websites, not news paper articles.. I'll update it to https://www.zaqart.com/projects/reclining_liberty/reclining_liberty.html since that is the artist's website. 👍

And no, not 3. All the ways that I listed above are either partially or completely DO NOT EXIST in the real world and do not belong in OSM

3 out of 30 that I looked at, out of 126 ways your changeset affected. 10% error rate in unacceptable in OSM.

Having non-existing features in OSM purely so that you can have them in ORM is "tagging for a renderer" and that's wrong.
If you continue to insist to have non-existing features which have been COMPLETELY removed with other infrastructure built in that place, not built over it, but INSTEAD of it, this will be raised with DWG because you are creating an invalid data model with features that do no represent the real world.

I wonder what's bigger vandalism and creates more damage to the map, removing disused and completely non-existing features or or creating fake features in the name of restoring deleted disused ones.🙄
Just a few imaginary tracks that I found spending 5 minutes looking only at one corner of your changeset. I'm sure there are many many more that must be deleted because they don't exist.
1075938749, 95899572, 95917747, 283123430, 11603038, 509892541, 432647217, 95897395, 95897393, 96149044, 96149068

For the 3rd time, you restored railroad tracks that have been completely removed with no traces left behind and new roads paved or buildings built over them. Why was that done?

Many that were deleted were completely removed with absolutely nothing left of them, with roads and buildings built on top since. Yet you restored them.

I updated it. You can see what I changed here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123281581

If they alternate then perhaps delete the long way bench and map each one as separate node (not attached to the path😉) and tag each one with appropriate material value.

Hello.
On some of the ways you added "name_1=" tag instead of "alt_name=". Could you please elaborate why did you do that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123257331

Thanks for adding that detail. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123250187

Hello.
According to documentation on parking:lane=*, there are couple of issues with your edit.
First is this kind of parking should be tagged as property of the way, not as a separate polygon.
Additionally, this appears to be "on_street" parking, not "street_side". Please see parking:lane=*#Distinguishing_between_on_street_and_street_side for more detailed explanation and other examples.
This needs to be fixed 👍

Hello.
This edit doesn't seem correct.
First you mapped benches as being part of the footpath. That is most definitely not the case :)
2nd, you added benches which you already mapped as 2 long ways, way/1075430640 and way/1075430639. That goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element principle.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123249016

You deleted brand= tag, but you didn't change brand:wikidata or brand:wikipedia or official_name tags. This leaves this POI with mixed info..

Hello.
You deleted brand= tag, but you didn't change brand:wikidata or brand:wikipedia or official_name tags. This leaves this POI info in mixed state...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123244502

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete this business' opening hours? This is a useful information to record.

Hello.
This business is clearly on the second floor, therefore it is useful for OSM to have that information recorded. Why did you delete this tag?

Could you please elaborate why did you update website address since the previous one was linking directly to this location's page?

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you update website address since the previous one was linking directly to this location's page?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123220200