Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
Satellite imagery shows these are just regular speed humps..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151684392

Hello.
Why did you delete valid data here?
This is considered vandalism!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151658687

Hello.
What is this feature?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151622724

Ira, the issue with that edit was that name:<lang>= is supposed to be a translation of name= tag into that language.
What you had was "name=West 103rd Street" and "name:en=Norman Rockwell Place", which is most definitely not a translation.

Since in NYC sometimes we have multiple names for the same street, for example 6th Ave can referred to Ave of Americas and other similar situations, and sometimes the city assigns these dedication names, such as "Odessa Steward Street", we needed more tags to distinguish them. Hence the honorary_name=* tag.
Keep in mind that not all dedication names are for dead people, so memorial_name=* is might not be applicable in all situations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151606045

On the screen where you enter your changeset comment, if you scroll down it shows a list of all the objects you'll be changing.

Hello.
Should "construction:" prefix be removed from some of these ways?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151600525

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? Relation of relations seems severely unnecessary here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598904

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? West Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598813

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? East Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598428

All of these changes are incorrect. You damaged Tokyo's boundary relation. And you added fountain tag to the wrong features in the 9/11 memorial in NYC. Fountain is already tagged there. You tagged incorrect element.
In the future, please, pay closer attention to what you are mapping, *especially* such high-profile places as NYC and Tokyo.

All of these changes will be reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151590783

Hello.
You added construction_start_expected= tag to these features with dates in the past.
Does that mean construction did not start?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151585199

It's kinda hard to review a changeset for potentially incorrect data deletion when it has 1186 modified objects...

Hello.
Please note that the branch name should go into branch= tag. You can read more about this tag at branch=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151569138

Well, looking at 11891776069
"name=La Gran'mere du Chimquiere" and "name:en=Menhir Statue 1800BC" are wrong. One is not the English translation of the other.
Looking at 11891775669, what is it?
node/11891775974, this is NOT how you tag bike rental place.
node/11891775672, this is NOT how you tag a port.
Plus all the other problems...

And what is the source of all this data?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151108208

You can list multiple names separated with ;
Or we also have honorary_name= and official_name= tags. I don't know what exactly those names are so apply tags as appropriate.

But then you get data inconsistency with alt_name= and alt_name:en= not matching/being translation.

Then it should be split/mapped as 2 buildings tagged as semi-detached.

Hello.
What is the source of this information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151554016

Hello.
It's a different business but they kept the same email address?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151553636

Hello.
The correct way to encode kids ride free is "fee:conditional=no @ age < 12". You can see this documented at fee:conditional=*
Also I don't think toll=yes is a valid tag here. Rather it should be fee=yes.
Please correct these issues.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151552200