OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
140159263

Hello.
Please note that opening hours you entered for that toilet building are incorrect. That tag has a specific syntax which can get pretty complicated. There's a useful website that allows you to generate the correct value for this tag simply by marking relevant hours on a time chart: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140159263

140100336

Hello.
Please note that this edit incorrect.
This should be a unique stop number. It's supposed to be printed on one side of those information boxes hanging on poles next to each stop.
The actual bus route number goes into route_ref= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140100336

140081204

Hello.
When mapping, please pay attention not to accidentally drag some feature out of place like you did here with a playground.

I fixed it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140081204

140080163

Hello.
Since feature is located in an area where English is the local language tag name:en= can be just osm.wiki/Tag:name=.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140080163

140076798

Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076798

140076773

Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076773

140076704

Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076704

140076251

Hello.
This information doesn't seem correct. nycdoitt lists BIN numbers from NYC DOB's database. It's 1 number per building... Somehow multiple bins got mushed into here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076251

140072250

Hello.
When adding names please don't abbreviate them, but fully spell them out.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140072250

140071767

Hello.
Please note when adding addresses street names must be fully spelled out. ie West 49th Street instead of "W 49 St".
If necessary computers can figure out how to abbreviate long strings, but going other way can be ambiguous. For example "St" can be "Street" or "Saint".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140071767

140044801

Hello.
Please note that this edit will be reverted since this feature's location is already encoded in the branch= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140044801

140038695

Hello.
Similar to the previous edit, what is the source of this data?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140038695

140033894

Hello.
What is the point of creating building relations here when simple building:part=yes achieves the same results?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033894

140033775

Hello.
Where is this data coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033775

139987921

Hello.
Could you please explain what did you map here?
I-495 is already fully mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139987921

139981408

Hello.
Existing foot=no already indicates that pedestrians are not allowed there.
Having just access=no means NOBODY is allowed there, not even buses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139981408

139978322

Hello.
While your changeset messages are not wrong, if it's a hassle for you to manually count all the benches and trash cans and picnic tables you added, those things can be omitted in favor of a more general overview of changes, especially for relatively simple edits in a small area. 👍🙂
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139978322

139951507

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you "fix" this intersecting building, when there's clearly no building on any available satellite imagery?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139951507

135193721

yes, it's best to keep edits grouped to smaller geographic locations, such as by neighborhood, city, county or state at most.

139796532

Ah, you are referring to the change that's on page 34 of that pdf?
Is that change already implemented? Street imagery from end of March 2023 still doesn't show this change.
If so, then yes, that segment of Fenton Ave should be deleted. You could tag that area as area=yes+highway=pedestrian+surface=asphalt or adjust the surface as necessary.
Or perhaps you could draw a long crosswalk along EGH crossing knapp St.