Hello.
Please note that the name "Pier 3 Labyrinth" was already tagged as alt_name tag. There's no need to duplicate that data in the name= tag as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140328970

Hello.
Is this an official name of this feature or just something you came up with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140327636

Hello.
This edit will be reverted once again.
"Brooklyn" location name is already tagged in the branch= tag, as documented in branch=*

If you continue with this edit war your account will be referred to Data Working Group, which can result in suspension or outright block.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140324031

Hello.
This edit will be reverted once again.
"Brooklyn" location name is already tagged in the branch= tag, as documented in branch=*

If you continue with this edit war your account will be referred to Data Working Group, which can result in suspension or outright block.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140323671

It looks like you tagged a few of these sidewalks as unmarked crossing. I fixed the ones I spotted but there might be more.

Hello.
Please note that since this node is in NYC, USA, the local language here is English. Therefore name= tag is supposed to be in English.
Also "INEE" part must be removed from the name tag go into name:short= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140309365

Hello.
Please note that this changeset will be reverted in full.
Blue Comet last ran on September 27, 1941.
OSM is a database about the world NOW, not what it was in the past.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140308192

Nothing is wrong with StreetComplete.
It already asks mappers to tag only relevant sections with height tag and it has an ability to split a way specifically for that.

I'm not sure what documentation you are referencing, but highway=stop#Tagging_minor_road_stops is pretty clear on how to map things. Putting stop signs at stop positions is a perfectly valid and more detailed way to map than putting them at way intersections.
Further more, it is the only correct way to tag them where only 1 road has to stop.

This needs to be corrected since data consumers, especially routers are affected by this.

This edit was reverted in full. description=* explicitly states that this tag MUST NOT be used for advertising or promotional messaging.

changeset/140304827

This edit was reverted in full. description=* explicitly states that this tag MUST NOT be used for advertising or promotional messaging.

changeset/140304827

Hello.
This way should've been split so that the height tag was only on the way where it actually applies.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140296505

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete many of the stop signs in this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140259522

Hello.
It is inappropriate to tag the whole buildings as a biz if that biz occupies only part of that building. Such biz must be tagged as a separate node.
I tried to correct it, but the website of this company blocks the ability to copy/paste any text such as phone numbers and hours. This is absolutely idiotic and moronic thing to do in 2023. I'm not going to manually retype all that info.
If you know them, tell them to fix this. Otherwise, feel free to submit accurate data yourself.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140258033

Broken mess?🤨I don't know where you are seeing this.
NYC buildings look fine in F4, streets.gl, osmbuildings, mapbox. Some how more details, some have less. Some could be improved. But it's hardly "a real broken mess".

I think you are misunderstanding the statement you quoted.
Yes, if there's a way with building:part=yes exists within the perimeter of a building outline, building outline is not rendered. That's not broken. That's by design.
It is so that the whole building can be correctly and accurately represented by all the necessary building:part=yes ways.

Hello.
Is this a single address for this whole building, or are different parts have different addresses?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140206196

Implication of setting min_height is that there's nothing below that feature, which is obviously not the case..
Please see min_height=*

Hello.
Rather than delete and create new, it's generally better to update existing features to be current. Doing that preserves history of that object, which can be useful to refer to at some point in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140189078

Hello.
You mapped a number of features that do not seem to match what's available on the satellite imagery you used. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140161924

This biz moved to a new location and has a new address, but its name which contains part of the address remained the same?
Seems a bit strange, no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140160929