OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
138598430

Hello.
Just like in the past you once again just blindly accept what AI detected without correcting obvious mistakes. 1190063433, 1190063420, 1190063443, 1190063406 are obviously separate buildings and should be mapped as such.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598430

138594849

I have also found https://linathhazedek.wordpress.com
There they call it "Chevra Linath Hazedek", while your link calls it "Khal Linath Hatzedeck". I don't speak Hebrew so I don't know which one is more appropriate... In the mean time I updated this building to have correct address and other tags.

138594849

So did they move to the new location or do they have more than 1 location?

Or was this location incorrectly tagged from the start and they were always just at Clara Street?

138595808

This changeset have been reverted in full due to severe data quality problems. Please read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines before doing any future imports.

changeset/138597728

138595808

Hello.
Please link where this import was discussed and documented.

There are severe data quality problems in it.

138594849

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? This building is most definitely not on Clara Street and this building's number can't be 109 since buildings to the left and right of it are 132 and 126.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138594849

138561185

Shouldn't cemeteries be "permissive" rather than "private"? ie everybody is allowed to come unless get kicked out...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138561185

138560239

Hydrant in the middle of the road?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138560239

138545120

Hello.
Is there street address or website or phone number for this business?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138545120

138541025

New York "Coty" or City?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138541025

138528765

New Boston stretches from Old Boston to Dallas?🤔

Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions. That makes it much easier to review them.

138514493

Hello.
What is this feature? Waterfall in Manhattan?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138514493

138487762

Hello.
This changeset will be reverted in full since you did not enter a single correct OSM tag.
Please take a look at osm.wiki/ for instructions on how to correctly map features.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138487762

138476882

Hello.
These kind of areas are not really necessary to map if the buildings are already mapped and properly tagged.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138476882

138476190

Hello.
The way you mapped sidewalks is incorrect. Just becuase there's a driveway, doesn't mean SIDEWALK should get a node of lowered curb. Lowered curb is not on the sidewalk, it's on the driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138476190

138382865

It would probably be best to update https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=toys&tt=lego#lego-80bf0f since that's what prompts to update brand wikidata articles in iD editor.

138450385

You are quick at catching this spam😅
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138450385

138382865

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you change this brand's wikidata article?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138382865

138391273

I'm not saying what you mapped it incorrect to the documents. What I'm saying is that what you mapped might not match what will actually be constructed at indeterminate point in the future.

Regarding proposed tag, in my opinion it doesn't belong on OSM just like all those razed/abondend/whatever railroad tags.
OSM is the map of NOW, not future or past.

138391273

Your linked document is called "final review", not the "final approved plan" or whatever terminology they use. And it's intended for general public comments, not actual structural plans based on which things will be positioned and built.
So we don't know if things will actually be where it shows in the document/where you mapped them.

The chance of someone going in a year or so later and remembering to remove proposed tag is just as high as someone going in 2-3 year later and properly mapping things that would've been built by then.
But in the mean time for 2+ years we have fictional, non-existing features on the map.