Added POI node/12233743407

Try and keep the changeset in a smaller area. I see you edited a track up north creating the large bbox.

Also, when adding buildings make sure to combine the address node with the building. (Select both and press C)

Looks like a bot took care of it but make sure to format the website url

Also, not to blow the air out of your sails but the State of Tennessee does have an open data portal for GIS address data.

So, while it might take a bit of time to import every TN address into OSM it would be the most efficient way. Although this would require experienced mappers to jumpstart the project.

The best use of your time is to properly trace buildings (most quickly done with JOSM if you are so inclined). I really hope you aren't just going in after and using Google Street View to add the addresses.

Hi, looking through theses edits I see no tangible benefits in creating these "template" buildings as you call it. (You also name every changeset exactly the same, but thats another topic)

The buildings you added do not reflect what is on the ground and it would not save you any time as apposed to drawing them proper from the start or just using Rapid editor for rough AI building traces.

If you so desire to contiunue this practice please consider using JOSM and making these edits to a saved .osm file and uploading them once you add all the details.

Related note: note/2078732

Hi, please be aware that the altname, altname2, altname3 tags are not valid. Consider using alt_name.

node/12000191624

As for this place I don't believe an alternative name is necessary at all.

Is there a reason why this pond is named "F"?

way/641935385

Would it be better to keep this building but use the lifecycle prefix for the tags?

You can still clearly see the base of the building even on foot. At least until this area gets developed a few decades later it can be deleted properly.

Project information: osm.wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA

Thanks for updating it. Notes were closed en masse by a now blocked user.

Project: osm.wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA

I was doing QA for routes https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.31567&lat=34.51586&zoom=15 and saw that an issue may have been caused by you when you split Civic Drive.

Be careful when splitting road medians since this can break route relations. Don't worry about PTv1 routes as those aren't useful and are far too broken, however make sure to fix up any PTv2 routes.

Related changeset: changeset/152477393

It does not classify as a knuckle type of turning circle either according to the wiki.

I don't believe the node here:
node/11964258134

Or the small way connecting it should exist. It's not exactly a turning circle.

Nice catch with the missing link but it's not exactly the right way to do it. I've updated it with changeset/152115021 if you wanted to take a look at it.

Could you please add changeset descriptions? "-" does not describe your changeset. Thanks.

Partially reverted by 151440288. Bus stop merged with building.

Reverted by changeset/151439877.

You merged a bus stop with the building.

Hi, I've updated the hours on Papaya to match the ones on their website. I also decided to just update the entire plaza, so if you're local feel free to verify the details.