100th edit 🎉

Hi, just letting you know that for PTv2 routes you should not be using the forward role on any of the members. I don't care if you mangle up the older PTv1 routes, those will be fully redone at a later time.

I recommend reviewing this website after your edits:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.82266&lat=33.66391&zoom=17

It usually updates once a day.

Thank you for resolving this changeset and 160348244. I appreciate it.

Thank you for checking and fixing it! I appreciate it.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.49171&lat=34.06579&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.51&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi, when adding the change:lanes, it would be recommended to split the existing way to maintain the routes.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.30466&lat=33.09804&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.51&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

I’m responsible for gradually upgrading the decade old routes to the new version (and the import of all the bus stops). However, every PTv2 route is correctly mapped and should be trivially easy to update in the JOSM editor as you update the intersections.

Please maintain those routes when modifying road geometry, it makes life a lot easier. I don’t care if you mess up the old PTv1 routes, those are mangled beyond repair.

Hi, please check bus routes when modifying road geometry. You ended up breaking route 60.

way/405517305 for example

By merging the dual carriageway you broke the bus routing. Please keep routes in mind when you modify roads.

I'm not sure if its different where you live but here the standard for three way T intersections is not the "pencil-tip" style. I've changed it here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159153679

Just a reminder: remember to remove the turn restrictions when deleting the segment.

Anyhow, I've gone ahead and fixed it when I was editing in this area.

Thanks for your insight CjMalone.

On another note, in my years of editing you're the first to do what you did. It would not be a streach for me to have jumped to that conclusion.

There is no confusion here. Thanks for asking though.

Also, I don't appreciate that the first thing you decided to do was scan through my changesets, in "retaliation", for me inquiring the method of how you got the hours for 50 locations.

I was more curious about the process, if it was automated, scraping tools were involved, or was manually done, etc but you seemly took it the wrong way.

Hi, the opening hours for this POI can be found on the website. Hope this helps.

Did you use a scraping program? I'm just curious. I know that theres a project called All the Places that does something similar.

Where is this data processed? Is it part of an existing project? The source is very vague.

Welcome back after a year of hiatus! Anyhow, what strategies are you using to figure out all these new developments or demolitions in your last few edits?

Hi, just letting you know this road doesn't have any cycleways and the tag you used would be invalid as the shoulder is used for parking. I've made an edit to correct it.

Hi, it looks like you deleted the hotel node/2332315947 even though the hotel still exists at this location. Just letting you know incase this may have been a mistake.

Also consider reading up on this: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

For just modifying two POIs across such a vast distance, it shouold be two changesets.