For bulk changesets like this could you be more specific in what you mean by fixing? I see you are removing the improper use of name tag as a descriptor, but it would be nice to say that in the title.

Thanks for the edit! When you get the chance make sure to use some tools to check for duplicate nodes or self-intersecting ways as you continue importing buildings. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-117.17660&lat=32.68997&zoom=15

Some examples of intersections would be these (which I now changed back into their normal configuration):

osm.org/#map=19/33.70118/-117.82210
osm.org/#map=19/33.70086/-117.82556

I don't like to add POIs in JOSM. Figured someone with local knowledge would add all the relevant information. Thanks' for the edit.

To clarify, would you mind explaining why you removed the fixme tags from East Meats Avenue without actually addressing anything?

Hi, in this changeset I noticed that you downgraded several T dual carriageway intersections into worse topology in the Irvine area. Could you refrain from modifying road geometry in that way from your edits? You clearly seem to be jumping all over the world and making edits without any consideration.

Secondly could you split your edits into smaller changesets so they are easier to revert? Thanks.

Hi I noticed you removed several fixme tags without resolving the issue along with downgrading some square intersections into pencil tip and you also added traffic signals in the wrong location.

Reverted by #150511320

Thank you for your edits! I've been slowly working on everything along Tustin Street, south of Lincoln Avenue and this helps a bunch.

Hi, just to let you know, you deleted several parts of a relation (8319625), which ended up breaking it. It's going to be tricky to fix so I may have to revert your changeset entirely.

You made several changesets all of which mass deleted large portions of the relation seemingly for no reason, was this all unintentional? You really shouldn't be using iD when modifying large relations.

Hi, just to let you know, you deleted several parts of a relation (8319625), which ended up breaking it. It's going to be tricky to fix so I may have to revert your changeset entirely.

Hi, just to let you know, you deleted several parts of a relation (8319625), which ended up breaking it. It's going to be tricky to fix so I may have to revert your changeset entirely.

Please split up your changesets, thanks.

Hey, could you be more descriptive with your changeset comments? I also noticed you broke several things by carelessly box selecting and deleting nodes for things that still exist.

Sorry if this sounds pretty blunt but personally, I think you should be user blocked until you start using more descriptive changeset comments and splitting up your edits. It's very difficult to validate your mass deletion edits when they're done like this.

You've been called out about this several times before, yet you never changed.

Please split changesets. Thanks.

Friendly reminder to keep edits local. Read more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

As this may have been an accident, make sure to double check what you're editing in OsmAnd stays within the same general area.

Correction in title: PTv2

Could you go back and fix your last few changeset? It seems like what your imports have the wrong address of addr:state=FL

This is only one section of many, and with most of the U-turn sections being done incorrectly as a separate way instead of following standardized mapping practices with the use of turn lanes it may take a while to correct.

When splitting a road into a dual carriageway please check ALL the tags especially :forward and :backward tags, as you left the turn lanes unmodified in the change. The adjacent junction was also incorrectly set up missing one-way segments and messed up turn restrictions.