thanks for a fix!

node/10819338166/history - how table tennis how dirt surface?

Hello! way/25605150/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit
why not use regular surface= tag?

way/402438943/history - surface=5 ?

was it supposed to be lanes=5 ?

Hello! way/93641063/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit
why not use regular surface= tag?

Hello! way/1310594058/history has shop = マックスバリュウ that was added in this edit
shop=マックスバリュウ ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

Hello! way/790331931/history has building = 21 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means

Hello! node/12979658710/history has shop = drugstore that was added in this edit
Would it be pharmacy tagged as amenity=pharmacy ( amenity=pharmacy )

Something else?

Hello! node/242960109/history has barrier = step_over that was added in this edit
What kind of barrier is here?

See barrier=* for a typical values

Is it maybe a stepover stile? See barrier=stile

Thanks for a fix!

> ref by itself is mysterious, so why not name it better?

no idea who had this idea, maybe it makes more sense fot UK native speakers?
Either way, it has got established and widely used. BTW, there are sillier ones, see osm.wiki/Counterintuitive_keys_and_values

the last sentence was completely mistaken, ironically I created that page on wiki

sorry

(I had prepared comment that I copy pasted and it was outdated - sorry for a confusion!)

Hello! node/9159329435/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12601657140/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12720552750/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/294888995/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12753128543/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/4337906534/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12396508913/history has bicycle:repair = assisted_self_service that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12818107221/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*