były te zmiany na forum omawiane?

note/5196348

I was responding to "However, I do not see how they relate to this changeset and to this account." part, it seems to be clearly operated by the same person

Is @NeisAgent lying about being run by @pitscheplatsch ?

@pitscheplatsch mentions "My Agent: NeisAgent"

There is no relation whatsoever to this specific edit but I found no better place to ask about it

also, I am not saying that it is wrong - but either plan for retagging or StreetComplete needs to be changed, or it will start asking again where maxweight:signed=no will disappear

as someone who would be among people responsible for changing SC code I have bias toward solution where I need to do less work :)

https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6763 - I was not aware about maxweight:signed=no also being migrated

note/5194200 - note that lifecycle prefixes should be also added to other tags

wycofuje changeset/176673458

wygląda to mi na ślepe podążania za walidatorem więc wycofam

node/659891184/history - to jest on czynny czy też nie?

see note/5194194

it appears that lifecycle prefix should be applied to more tags

see also https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1982

What @NeisAgent is?

Is it some LLM-powered bot?

What was the point of emojis in note/5193596 ?

jak ścieżki istnieją to dodajemy access=no a nie kasujemy je (patrz note/5194081 )

changeset/179482737

jak ścieżki istnieją to dodajemy access=no a nie kasujemy je (patrz note/5194081 )

changeset/179482604

jak ścieżki istnieją to dodajemy access=no a nie kasujemy je (patrz note/5194081 )

changeset/179482556

raczej nie dam rady tego dodać, zrobiłem note/5194081

jak ścieżki istnieją to dodajemy access=no a nie kasujemy je

changeset/179482318

jak ścieżki istnieją to dodajemy access=no a nie kasujemy je

changeset/179482270

thanks for cleanup!

ani osiedlami ani innymi realnymi obiektami administracyjnymi