Hello! node/10778007350/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/4708870499/history has bicycle:repair = mobile that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12766468551/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/8032622099/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/6724941682/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10665000594/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/705459010/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10690475024/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/13074971723/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/11538082797/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/11177573877/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/5150402677/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10205355086/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/11748319282/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

thanks!

it seems so, but if I find myself completely mistaken I prefer to map something else after reverting myself.

And big thanks for noticing the problem!

> Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.

well, the problem was that I was unaware that I am missing crucial info. I will be more careful in future.

And big thanks for noticing the problem!

> Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.

well, the problem was that I was unaware that I am missing crucial info. I will be more careful in future.

Sorry! Should be now fixed and other edits like that also fixed.

In general I am trying to avoid stupid mistakes like that and rather ask people - as explanation "bankomat" is a word in Polish for ATM. I should have researched it better, especially if object was outside Poland.

Sorry! Should be now fixed and other edits like that also fixed.

In general I am trying to avoid stupid mistakes like that and rather ask people - as explanation "bankomat" is a word in Polish for ATM. I should have researched it better, especially if object was outside Poland.