Hello Omnific! Thanks for your feedback! We have been adding a bunch of businesses in the Portland area using Mapillary, primarily so that our riders will be able to discover them via our new Pelias geocoder. We add business type tags when they're clear, but sometimes (as in the case of this business) it isn't obvious. In such cases, we typically move on the the next business rather than get into a tagging rabbit hole, since just the name will provide the geocoding functionality we're after and there are still a LOT of untagged businesses to cover. I hope this makes sense! Please let me know if you have follow up questions.

Thank you Peter! Really appreciate your assistance and clean up on this.

Your changeset comment mentions Residential, but you actually tagged them as service. Service is correct - please just don't have misleading changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61853295

Hello! The access tagging and oneway tagging were inconsistent in this lot after this changeset, which can create issues for routing engines.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61818193

Hello! This change set could create problems for our router and others, because it of the inconsistent use of access=private tags within the development. Our router won't go on a way tagged as access=private unless it's at the start or end of a trip, and I think this is pretty common. Since there was one way in here that wasn't tagged as access = private, it creates an access island, or fragment. I fixed this one, but please watch for this in the future! Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61614367

This is a building, not a park. Please don't degrade the map to improve your Pokemon Go experience.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59158123

Hi! This changeset looks fine but the hashtags seem wrong and confusing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58827337

hello! It doesn't look like there is much of a park here. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I'll have to revert the changeset. People have been adding fictitious parks for Pokemon Go purposes, so we're all just trying to keep the map correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58631975

hello! It doesn't look like there is much of a park here. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I'll have to revert the changeset. People have been adding fictitious parks for Pokemon Go purposes, so we're all just trying to keep the map correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58635807

Hi! I'm not sure that a planned park should be added yet... If it were a street then proposed= * would be appropriate (proposed=*) but I'm not sure with a park...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57880488

Hello! These streets are not named, and are listed as service streets in our authoritative local streets data set (http://rlisdiscovery.oregonmetro.gov/?action=viewDetail

I am reverting this changeset because the carriageway actually is divided just north of McDonald. Worse, the oneway tags and number of lane tags were not updated when the separated carriageways were merged. This makes the HWY one way for a short stretch, messing up navigation on a major road.

Great catch, thank you! That section is also classified in RLIS as "minor residential" and I will change it now.

Hi - I did look at the aerials yes, and this seemed more like apartment complex landscaping to me than a park. The fake name (Dawson Park) was a bigger issue -
it's the name of a real park in the area and thus could thus lead to geocoder issues. I see your new version doesn't include a fake name, so I'm fine with letting it stand as is.

Hello there! Please don't add fictitious parks to enhance your pokemon go experience. Here are some good tips: osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers. Reverting this changeset.

Hello there! FYI, private streets, especially named ones like these, should definitely be included in the map. They are tagged as access=private so that routers will not direct people onto them. (see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/7424/private-access-roads). Also, these two are included in the Metro RLIS dataset. They're legit! As such, I'm reverting this changeset.

Hello!
My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its
status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error.
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55568428

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55568428

Sorry, but I am deleting this park as there is not an official park. There is a real Dawson Park in a totally different part of town. I also suspect Pokemon Go editing here because of the username.

Ah, awesome! Thank *you*I