OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
61818193

Hello! The access tagging and oneway tagging were inconsistent in this lot after this changeset, which can create issues for routing engines.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61818193

61614367

Hello! This change set could create problems for our router and others, because it of the inconsistent use of access=private tags within the development. Our router won't go on a way tagged as access=private unless it's at the start or end of a trip, and I think this is pretty common. Since there was one way in here that wasn't tagged as access = private, it creates an access island, or fragment. I fixed this one, but please watch for this in the future! Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61614367

59158123

This is a building, not a park. Please don't degrade the map to improve your Pokemon Go experience.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59158123

58827337

Hi! This changeset looks fine but the hashtags seem wrong and confusing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58827337

58631975

hello! It doesn't look like there is much of a park here. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I'll have to revert the changeset. People have been adding fictitious parks for Pokemon Go purposes, so we're all just trying to keep the map correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58631975

58635807

hello! It doesn't look like there is much of a park here. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I'll have to revert the changeset. People have been adding fictitious parks for Pokemon Go purposes, so we're all just trying to keep the map correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58635807

57880488

Hi! I'm not sure that a planned park should be added yet... If it were a street then proposed= * would be appropriate (proposed=*) but I'm not sure with a park...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57880488

57728887

Hello! These streets are not named, and are listed as service streets in our authoritative local streets data set (http://rlisdiscovery.oregonmetro.gov/?action=viewDetail

52104322

I am reverting this changeset because the carriageway actually is divided just north of McDonald. Worse, the oneway tags and number of lane tags were not updated when the separated carriageways were merged. This makes the HWY one way for a short stretch, messing up navigation on a major road.

55951768

Great catch, thank you! That section is also classified in RLIS as "minor residential" and I will change it now.

55342051

Hi - I did look at the aerials yes, and this seemed more like apartment complex landscaping to me than a park. The fake name (Dawson Park) was a bigger issue -
it's the name of a real park in the area and thus could thus lead to geocoder issues. I see your new version doesn't include a fake name, so I'm fine with letting it stand as is.

55342051

Hello there! Please don't add fictitious parks to enhance your pokemon go experience. Here are some good tips: osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers. Reverting this changeset.

55780322

Hello there! FYI, private streets, especially named ones like these, should definitely be included in the map. They are tagged as access=private so that routers will not direct people onto them. (see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/7424/private-access-roads). Also, these two are included in the Metro RLIS dataset. They're legit! As such, I'm reverting this changeset.

55568428

Hello!
My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its
status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error.
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55568428

55568428

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55568428

55221830

Sorry, but I am deleting this park as there is not an official park. There is a real Dawson Park in a totally different part of town. I also suspect Pokemon Go editing here because of the username.

53117688

Ah, awesome! Thank *you*I

53117688

Hello Oregon on Demand! It looks like you may have been importing external data to OSM. Have you had a chance to review the import guideslines, here: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines? It's important to notify local OSM contributors before undertaking something like this - one communication channel you might consider using would be https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/osm-pdx

42333246

Hmm, interesting. I wonder if the wiki should be updated? I can refrain from making this correction in the future, but as you said, it makes little difference. Thanks!

43022663

Comments is wrong - this was just removing service=driveway from a few highway=service streets that were large enough to show up in RLIS and aren't really driveways.