Please don't change `area:highway=footway` to `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes` for the sake of making it displayed. They have different meaning. Tagging For Renderer is a bad practice.

No, this is not redundant. `leisure=garden` shows the area is a garden. It doesn't say when green coverage exists there. `natural=` adds the exact shape of the specific landscaping.

Please don't attach areas to roads.

Thx, but it's better to keep both together.

Please don't blindly upgrade tags. There were some nonsense case before eg `network:en=Hong Kong Metro` a clear mistake.

Can you please stop changing HK Tramway Ltd to RATP?

Please be careful not to change the entire building.

What is this trying to do?

Please split the tree area, not deleting the whole thing.

There is already a `motor_vehicle=permit` here though?

This is `route=railway`, not `route=tracks`. I meant MOL is included the ERL system alongside EAL. Though not sure how things are organized now. Conceptually the TML service can still be seen to run through West Rail and Ma On Shan Rail.

Some turn restriction you added duplicates existing ones.

Can you please stop removing names from sidewalks.

Please check there are `placement=transition` sections here.

There is already node/445255100

N-th reminder: Please don't delete & re-draw, or change `=traffic_signals` to `=marked`.

`crossing=traffic_signals` is the correct one, not `=pedestrian_signals`.

Please don't remove `barrier=kerb` either.

Can you please stop changing HK Tramway Ltd to RATP? That's not the company directly.

The government simply thrown a bunch of stuff on the same layer / as the same object type for everything. There is not explanation, distinction, or area of validity. It could even a remnant of the demolished village.
HK Post even records Lung Kwu Tan Rd in the address only. LandsD has a record of Black Point used as the address. https://geodata.gov.hk/gs/view-dataset;jsessionid=4882EB791AE66D609EE6DD4C8B112750?uuid=f38039e6-29d9-4151-860a-dec8f9ee3d08&sidx=0
The natural gas pipeline landfall didn't mention Yung Long either. Using your arguement of absorbing into bigger places, doesn't Yung Long only appearing on the base lower at very close zoom shows it's lower significance than Black Point?
What other Geoinfo sites are you referring to? You have not mentioned this.
Very funny to claim "weak argument" when your Wikipedia evidence already gives a conflicting account.
The government has been using Black Point for the power station, radar station, and a demolished weather station. This is also used in the Lung Kwu Tan reclamation study, and future Black Point quarry. Of course this may refer to the cape and mountain proper, but Yung Long has not been further in use.