Please don't remove `ele=`

Please discuss at note/3146813

`leisure=track` should be used for ones forming a circuit inside parks, not `=cycleway`.

How do stations affect the line?

I have been adding `train=yes` to them, as I was told there was a compromise to make East Rail Line and Tuen Ma Line as `route=subway` on `railway=rail`. I must have accidentally removed some `subway=yes`. However they are in reality mainline trains upgraded as rapid transit. I have been contemplating to change them to `route=train` altogether.

1. `bus=designated` is only used on bus lanes, not bus stops.
2. `bus=yes` or this means all bus vehicles can use them, including non-franchised and private buses.

`vehicle=bus` is not valid. Please fix your application to accept `bus=`.

What are you trying to do again? You removed the English name, and made it non-lit. Please fix the application you are using.

Don't mix `bridge=yes` either.

Please don't change `=footway` + `indoor=yes` to `=corridor` + `indoor=yes`. That's archaic.

Before that, I should remind you Google Street View is not allowed to be used, except in other discussions.
There are 2 possibilities:
1. If you look at previous years, the canopy does extend over the roadway, at least in this months.
2. There may be alignment issues with the imagery offset.

"Natural wood" is an inaccurate preset name. There are many other issues with them.

1. Why is it not good? If the foliage does extend over the road, drawing across
2. Common misunderstanding there. `natural=wood` does not mean it is "natural" in origin. It means the trees part of nature, like `natural=water`. I have already added `managed=yes`, and `moved=yes` or `anthropogenic=yes` are possible theoretically, but not unless you know the actual history of these trees. If they are trees, they are woodland.

`=tree_row` is not a replacement for `=wood` areas. (rather it is widely considered the latter is preferred, which I don't take a position here)
You haven't replicated trees in the park, and foilage inside Tsing Yi Estate.

What do you mean by "not presented correctly"? Fix their shape. You deleting them straight out is very "rude" to other's effort as well.

This is not about `=shrubbery`, You are removing the `=wood` that actually exists there. `=hedge` and `=tree_row` are not relevant to this.

Not sure if a `place=farm` should get `tourism=zoo` simply because it raises animals.

Frontage road should not be `=service` simply because they are called "service roads".

Please don't delete tree areas.

No brackets as descriptor labels please. OSM is not a printed map. `name=` is for proper names only.