Ach und PT-53, dir sei noch wärmstens das JOSM Style (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles/Coloured_buildings) ans Herz gelegt.

It looks like data for local (and offline) usage without any benefit for the public osm database.
I think it should be reverted immediately.

@PT-53: wärst du vielleicht so nett und freundlich uns transparent mitzuteilen, welche Keys du noch aus deinen persönlichen rationellen Gründen angepasst hast?
PS: Nein, du musst dich nicht rechtfertigen, aber das würde vielleicht dein hiermit beschädigtes Image als langjähriger und ernstgenommener Mapper nicht ins bodenlose sinken lassen.

Sorry, but the live and production database of OSM isn't the right place for "experimentation", right? Please have a look at
osm.wiki/Using_the_dev_server

And because of buildings intersecting landuse=forest i expect a revert of all this changes...

As i have already mentioned: ref
ref=*

Hello FrikanRW. In this changesets you tagged a lot of `building=yes` and `tourism=chalet` in combination with the so far unkown key `nommer`. Shouldn't it better be `ref` ?!

bzgl. Öffnungszeiten ist sicherlich folgendes lesenswert:
osm.wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
sowie das/ein entsprechendes Tool dafür:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

And please have a look at your values:
there's any building=bunglow, instead use building=bungalow
building=bungalow
This was already mentioned and commented by
changeset/54326713

Ok, you just fixed the wrong "bunglow", but why not fixed "builing:level", too?
way/544522258
Please have a look at
changeset/54274260
I think the DWG should block him and revert all his changesets.

I have informed the DWG to block him, because he still uploads these wrong keys (and value)

Hello Arshan Arshan again.

Could it be that you and Hashaam doing some imports?

Please have a look at
osm.org/query?lat=24.82526&lon=67.05808

Hashaam has mapped "buildings" as node (a little bit uncommon), and you now map the building outline around it?

Please see the other changeset comment of Hashaam
changeset/52407531

Hello Hashaam.

Could it be that you and Arshan Arshan doing some imports?

Please have a look at
osm.org/query?lat=24.82526&lon=67.05808

You have mapped "buildings" as node (a little bit uncommon), and Arshan Arshan now map the building outline around it?

Please see the other changeset comment of Arshan Arshan
changeset/54273430

Hello Arshan Arshan. In this and other changesets you have used the misspelled key `builing:levels`. I think you should clean up your changes.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22builing%3Alevels%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22builing%3Alevels%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22builing%3Alevels%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B

But if someone fix only what you described in the note then the outline still intersects the highway and has no "functional" attributes...

Hello ChrissW-R1, at
way/501339355
you have fixed some keys ... but:
- why have you left `Addr: place`
- addr:place=intol was already there**, although the nearby place is "Damai Tole"
- the outline has no main tag (name with addr is like nothing)
- the outline lays over a highway

** https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/501339355

PS: I don't check other changesets of you and i hope you don't do just simple stupid keys fixing with `similar_keys` rather look at the whole object. Please have a look at the last paragraph at
https://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-03-05-new-taginfo-features-and-a-challenge.html

Hello Alessandro. As discussed and commented in your other changesets i think you should stop uploading "new buildings" and revert ALL your uploads from the last three days.

E.g. in this changeset you have an intersecting of water and building:
way/539008610

Hi. You have tagged (a - perhaps misspelled - form of) `second chance youth`. Can you tell us something about, what it is and who has initiate it? And why do you use Vespucci? Are there some instructions?

The problem is that some other mappers on St. Lucia tag it too but in different spellings (e.g. `second-chance youth`, `secondchance youth`, `2nd chance youth`, and so on). And none of these keys aren't goot practice, because they contain whitespace characters! Also it's difficult for evaluators to find all these different spellings.

Hi. You have tagged (a - perhaps misspelled - form of) `second chance youth`. Can you tell us something about, what it is and who has initiate it? And why do you use Vespucci? Are there some instructions?

The problem is that some other mappers on St. Lucia tag it too but in different spellings (e.g. `second-chance youth`, `secondchance youth`, `2nd chance youth`, and so on). And none of these keys aren't goot practice, because they contain whitespace characters! Also it's difficult for evaluators to find all these different spellings.

I think we should revert it immediately because there are also intersecting buildings:
way/538473003
way/538841878

@mueschel: do you want to do it or should we inform the DWG?