OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
166857599

A valid and appropriately shaped footprint. If it were a little smaller it'd be excellent. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls somewhat. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857599

166857505

These footpritns are valid and you distinguished between round and square buildings well but they could be more accurate. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. please remember to square (q) your footprints. The southern most footprint should be extended southward; it is partially covered by a tree but its full extent can be determined using bing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857505

168402696

The footprints I flagged are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402696

168403109

The Eastern footprint represents a building while the western one represents a likely garden. Beware that walls can cast shadows similar to buildings; use context clues to help you determine which is which.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403109

168403281

The western footprint is oversized, the southern one is a garden not a building and the eastern one is actually square not round; you can tell becasue of the roof colour. Buildings with blue roofs in this area do not tend to be round. Determine how the scene is lit and use that information to aid your interpretation.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403281

168403555

You were doing the right thing by modifying the residential area and improved its geometry, but it and a highway share nodes with buildings. Hold alt while mapping to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403555

168403794

The footprint I flagged contains multiple buildings. Map one building per footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403794

168404037

These footprints are generally the correct shape but are oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404037

168404547

You created shared nodes between footprints and the area. Read mt project comments to see how to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404547

168404283

The shape of the footpritns you added here appears correct. THe footprint I flagged is actually a tree; you can tell becasue it overlaps a square building's footprint so a building could not fit there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404283

159483108

You improved the map data here by replacing oversized building footprints. The ones you added could still be more accurate, please remember to square footprints when appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483108

159453048

These footprints do not accuratelly represent the shape of buildings in the imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159453048

159452042

Welcome to OSM! these footpritns are oversized outlining yards and gardens as well as the buildings. Take care to map only the buildings and one footprint per building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159452042

168404337

Welcome to OSM! The round buildings in the SW and the Western most square footprint are well mapped. More like that in future please.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404337

168403046

welcome to OSM. PLease upload your work every 5-15 minutes rather than uploadign each footprint individually. This saves time saving and uploading your work and makes it easier for others to review it. A good changeset should have a logical theme and the edits should be in close geographical proximity. E.g. you could have mapped multiple or even all the buildings in this settlement and then uploaded your changes. --- Please read my project comments regarding building digitisation. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403046

168402930

You idenitifed square buildings in the imagery but their footprints could be more accurate. Please read my project comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402930

164094244

These building footpritns are valid but inaccurate; they are generally oversized and should be squared (q).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094244

164335455

all round buildings are valid and fairly accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164335455

166859427

I flagged some accurate and valid footprints. PLease map more like that in future. Thank you for yout contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427

166859558

appropriate highway modificaion. I flagged footpritns that envelope multiple buildings. The L shaped building in the East is quite accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859558