OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168822395 | The building footprints you added were incorrectly tagged with the value river: I resolved the invalid tagging error. The footprints you mapped were inaccurate. The project you're working on requests the mapping of highways and waterways; please only modify other features if they are causing problems with mapping the requested features. You're likely restricted in the tagging available in ID so that you stick to the project scope. See Changeset: 168891442 for my resolution of the tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168403237 | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate (oversized). You reduced the accuracy of some existing footprints. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159237547 | footpritns of individual buildings should be tagged with building=* and so likely beyond the scope of the project you were working on. Try to see if a simple shape will suffice when mapping buildings before more unique options. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166859991 | The footprint I flagged envelopes two buildings. It's easier to see this in bing.
|
|
| 166859199 | You are identifying buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are generally oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint. I think this oversizing contributed to the mapping of shared nodes and overlapping between footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 164178107 | Generally the buildings you mapped are valid and appropriately squared, but oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint and keep in mind that roofs tend to overhang building walls.
|
|
| 159483751 | Overall a good contribution. The footpritns are generally valid and accurate. The highways and residential areas have been modified to avoid data overlap issues.--- Highways should follow the centre of the road in the imagery. The round footprint you mapped should be square because it has a blue roof its shape can be better seen in Bing --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159717588 | There is a building here but the footprint you mapped is several times the size of the building. Accuracy of mapping matters. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168404130 | Don't worry about having deleted those footprints; I restored them.
|
|
| 166857442 | The footprints you're adding are valid, appropriately squared, and fairly accurate, though sometimes slightly oversized. You mapped with bing imagery which is older at time of mapping and so the footprints do not align with ESRI. I recomment offsetting imagery before mapping. You can read about how to do this in my project comments.
|
|
| 168404130 | The 5 Southern most footprints here are fairly accurate though should be squared (q). In the North you deleted and replace footprints with lower quality ones. Deletion is sometimes the best option, but not always. Here the buildings could have been moved (m) to align them with ESRI imagery rather than mapping from scratch (provided they were accurate). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168402958 | Valid footprints but the imagery allows for them to be more accurate. Pease remember to square them with q. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166859766 | Vakid and quite accurate footprint. Please remember to square footprints when appropriate.
|
|
| 168402761 | I think the northern footprint envelopes multiple buildings.
|
|
| 168403608 | Though the imagery allows them to be mapped more accurately all the round footprints you added here are valid i.e. they represent round buildings in the imagery.
|
|
| 168402844 | Welcome to OSM! These footprints do represent buildings in the imagery but they could be more accurate. Remember to square footprtins when appropriate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168402847 | These footprints could be more accurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159483385 | The footprints I flagged here have odd and inaccurate shaped. check to see if a building's footprint could be accurately mapped using simple shapes before considering more unique options. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 159482757 | You correctly identified that this is a T shaped building
|
|
| 159482984 | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints could be more accurate. I flagged two footprints which I though were well mapped. It looks like you mapped using alternate imagery or an offset leading to a missalignment with ESRI. I corrected this.
|