Hi begrian, you correctly identified buildings in the imagery. Most though not all footprints here have been appropriately squared. The footprints you mapped are generally oversized and some (flagged) likely envelope multiple buildings; use roof colour and shadows to determine building size, shape and where one building ends and another begins. Use shift+(-/+) to scale selected features after tagging and shaping them. --- Landuse and footpritns should not share common nodes. I recommend watching the new mapper common mistakes videos here https://www.youtube.com/@TheMissingMaps/videos ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168703315

Hi Esabela, the footprints I flagged envelope multiple buildings. Every footprint should represent an individual building. Use shadows, roof colour and a secondary imagery source to idenitfy where one building ends and another begins.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168678873

This is likely a temporal yurt and should not be mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402802

The footprints I didn't flag are valid and accurate circular footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402969

The footprints I flagged envelope multiple buildings. Each footprint should represent one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483560

Remember that you're looking at roofs which sometimes have light and dark parts. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482901

You aligned these footprints to bing; the instructions state to align data to ESRI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403028

This footprint envelopes multple buildings. Each footprint should represent an individual building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403104

You're identifying buildings in the imagery but they're generally slightly oversized. Read my project comment regarding building mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403363

The footprints you added represent buildings in the imagery but could be more accurate. Landuse and footpritns should not share nodes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858635

The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682

The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682

the footprins you added here are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. You corectly modified the residential area to avoid overlap with the footprints you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403175

Hi Charlotte, the footprint you added my represent a temporal yurt and perhaps should not have been added. It has been rounded correctly but is oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403507

Hi, Marie. The footprints you mapped here are valid and appropriately squared. The western one is inaccurate the Easterone is almost accurate but is slightly too long see how I mapped them in Changeset: 168925772. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403145

Hi Pole Pole, There are a few things that I see could be done better in this changeset. It was a good idea to copy and paste footprints; this could have been applied to the inner and outer ways of the multipolygons too. Read this diary @Koreller/diary/404988 ---The residential tags should have been preserved. The inner and outer ways should not have building tags: see how they render on the OSM carto layer and check the multipolygon wiki page. You identified buildings under construction, but did not use the construction tag correctly Reference: construction=* ---It appears to me that you did not properly account for off-nadir when positioning the footprints and on at least one occasion you mapped a footprint which overlapped an exieting one: replacing its geometry (ctrl.+shift+g) would have been the best approach. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166752306

Take care to ensure that your highways follow the centre of the road visible in imagery, especially in dense populated areas becasue they could overlap other features which have not been mapped yet. I haven't check thouroughly but your tagging of highways appears reasonable. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822780

Highways and landuse areas should not share nodes: hold alt while mapping to prevent this. The highways I flagged overlap but do not share a common node: the junction is invalid and routing software will not recognise it as such. Take care that you connect highways to one another at junctions. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822850

Invalid building tagging; I addressed it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822626

See my resolution in Changeset: 168891669. Accuracy is important when mapping; quality is much more desirable than quantity. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. You can see how I mapped these footprints in the affore mentioned changeset. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822091