OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
166859427

You correctly modified the highway to avoid data overlap.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427

166859427

Welcome to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. The imagery allows for these footprints to be more accurate. Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the roofs and look for the gaps between the buildings or different roof colors to help determine where one building ends and another begins.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Don't include the building's shadow.

Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427

164090438

You did well to delete invalid footprints that enveloped multiple buildings, but the footprints you added could have been more accurate and squared (q). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090438

164177642

You made a good decision to not square all of the corners of the SE footprint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177642

164177990

You correctly identified buildings in imagery. Some of these footprints are oversized. You correctly identified the shape of the L shaped building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177990

164180112

Most buildings here are valid but inaccurate becasue they are oversized and have not been squared.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180112

164324998

scratch last. Hold ctrl. to prevent the creation of common nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324998

164324998

Hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324998

164325143

You identified buildings in imagery. You deleted valid footprints which could have been modified instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325143

166858331

some of these footprints are well mapped when looking at bing which was used to map them. I recommend aligningit to ESRI so that features are properly aligned. See my project comment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858331

166859574

The footprints I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings. Map footprints slightly smaller than the roof since it likely overhangs the walls somewhat.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859574

166860909

It's good that you're using multiple sources to aid your interpretation; I recommend that you offset the imagery source before digitising to keep features correctly aligned with one another. In this case the buildings are several meters West of where they should be if they were aligned to ESRI as per the instructions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860909

168402655

The buildings you added here are likley temporal yurts and should not be mapped as they will likely not be there for long. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402655

159484189

You correctly differentiated between round and square buildings. The round building has been appropriately rounded but the square buildings have not been squared and tend to have odd shapes. I recommend watching the missing maps beginer mistakes youtube videos.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159484189

166860694

The footprint I flagged should be L shaped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860694

166860560

You identified buildings in the imagery and appropriately squared them. The ones I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860560

166858558

I do not believe the features I tagged represent buildings visible in imagery but rather yards or parts of them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858558

166858121

The geometry of the footpritns you mapped here is generally good, though could be a more accurate at times. Check Changeset: 168817115 to see how I mapped some of these features. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls of buildings and some include the building's shadow in the footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858121

166863202

The Western Footprint is well mapped more like this in future please. Check Changeset: 168816457 to see how I mapped these buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166863202

166859212

These footprints are valid but inaccurate. Take care to not include the shadow of a building in its footprint as that makes it oversized. The footprint you deleted is also valid.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859212