OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 151854983 | All of these footprints are valid but oversized. Take a look at Changeset: 158683128 to see how I mapped them. I hope this helps. Thank you for your contribution.
|
|
| 154570884 | The mapping of buildings in this changeset is certainly a significant improvement over what was here before. Buildings have more accurate shapes and you preserved the metadata of existing mapping. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 153711225 | I believe that the northern footpritns envelope vegetation. The southern footprint is valid.
|
|
| 153230421 | You also extended (modified) a highway in this changeset. Please check that your comment is accurate when uploading.
|
|
| 154570884 | You also modified a highway in this changeset. Please check that your comment is accurate when uploading.
|
|
| 154570233 | The vast majority of footprints here are valid, appropriately squared and are quite accurate in their orientation. Some however are oversized for instance WAY: 1304486921 envelopes the shadow that the building casts and WAY: 1304486920 is extended too far to the NW.--- Please take a look at Changeset: 158642006 (open it in you editor) first through bing imagery where the building is being constructed then in ESRI when the roof is present and see how in that case the roof compares to the footprint I drew. If you encounter odd situations, and perhaps imagery distortions it is usually the safer bet to map the footprint slightly smaller, becasue generally: building footprint <= building roof.
|
|
| 153711088 | Most of the footprints in this changeset are invalid, becasue they are within the the banks of a river. They likely envelope things like boulders and tree trunks.--- WAY: 1300054051 & WAY: 1300054050 are good footprints. ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154568237 | I believe that WAY: 1304480052 is not a building becasue I cannot find evidence for it in other imagery sources and it looks like vegetation. I think that WAY: 1304480051 is also not a building becasue it looks like vegetation, casts a shadow on the building represented by WAY: 1286849643 and it overlapped with the footprint that I drew for WAY: 1286849643. I recommend that you flick through some of the other imagery options if you come accross a feature that may or may not exist in one of the sources, and if you're not sure then either don't add it, or add it with a fix me tag.
|
|
| 153834881 | You're welcome. |
|
| 158644973 | You're welcome. |
|
| 153829531 | I don't understand. Is there maybe a typo here?
|
|
| 153710488 | I think that WAY: 1300051192 envelopes vegetation. When loooking at ESRI you can better see the colour of the leaves.--- The orientation of WAY: 1300051193 seems a little off (could be rotated CCW), view the image at its native resolution to get the most accurate oreintation information. Its size was appropriate---WAY: 1300051191 is oversized.---See Changeset: 158645319 for my modifications.
|
|
| 154576768 | All footprints are valid, and squared appropriately. Good job drawing the octagon. I made some minor modifications you can see in Changeset: 158644973. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 151799576 | Tis footprint is valid, appropriately squared and accurate in orientation. It is also oversized but overall a good changeset. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 151842864 | Footprints are valid but some are oversized and those with more complex shapes are represented with quadrilaterals.
|
|
| 151842146 | See Changeset: 158636332 for my modification of some of the buildings here.
|
|
| 151842146 | Well done in avoiding highway/building errors. However some of the building footprints could be more accurate for instance WAY: 1286761664 should be a T shaped building and WAY: 1286761645 an L shaped building.
|
|
| 151842017 | All but one of these footprints is valid. The footpritns are sometimes inaccurate in size,shape and orientation. e.g. WAY: 1286761082 & way/1286761100 should be mapped as 'L' shaped buildings.---It's good to move the highway out of the way to prevent overlaps however you should include the fact that you modifed the highway in your changeset comment. I recommend that you modify features like highways first if you suspect that they will cause issuses, becasue they can be quite long and lead to your changesets being large and making it more difficult to find the smaller features you've mapped. Thank you for your contribution.
|
|
| 151841926 | This footprint is, valid accurate in orientation and appropriately squared, but is oversized due to off-nadir distortion. The fact that it is too large can be seen in ESRI imagery which is closer to nadir. See my changes in Changeset: 158633158.---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 151841897 | The northern footprint is a top quality contribution; valid, accurate in shape and orientation, and appropriately squared. Please map to this standard in future.---The southern footprint is valid, but is oversized and the orientation could be more accurate. See how I modified it in Changeset: 158632833.---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|