OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156144917 | I believe that this footprints outlines a vehicle. I deleted it in Changeset: 158836337. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156520242 | The Eastern walls of buildings are visible in the imagery here. See how I mapped this building in Changeset: 158836182. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156520227 | The footprints here are inaccurate and contain excess nodes. In order to square buildings you must draw them close to squre and then press q. zooming in and out can help when interpreting imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 155801564 | The buildings in this changeset appear to have been appropriately squared. WAY: 1311360980 is an oversized footprint, because it includes the walls of the building visible in off-nadir imagery.
|
|
| 153787754 | These footprints should be squared. Please press q after tagguing areas as buildings.
|
|
| 153591250 | The vast majority of these footprints are valid, however they should be squared. The features I flagged consist of excess nodes. Press q after tagging areas as buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154624833 | WAY: 1301468375 has an unlikely building shape. I recommend checking alternate imagery sources to get a better appreciation of a building's shape. I mapped this as two buildings in Changeset: 158835410.
|
|
| 157233504 | You should check to see what options you have to resolve an overalp. Layer tags are used for when things are above, or below each other. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 153962111 | All building footprints here are valid and appropriately squared. I think that WAY: 1301467973 should actually be a quadrilateral and that it just has a darker section of roof. This appears to be the case when cross referencing ESRI.
|
|
| 155802142 | Take a look at Changeset: 158832400 to see how I mapped it.
|
|
| 155802142 | The building represented by WAY: 1303918492 has a shape which is more complex than a quadrilateral. You certainly improved this footprint. Please try to make the shapes of footprints accurate. It is possible to see the wall of this building in the imagery and it should not be included in the footprint becasue that'll make it oversized.
|
|
| 154446594 | Most of the building footprints here appear to be valid but they are not very accurate. Most of these features should have been squared. Please press q after tagging areas as buildings.--- WAY: 1303918490 is not a building. You can tell because it does not cast a similar shadow to nearby buildings. I mapped this as a sports pitch. WAY: 1303918492 does not outline a building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154585445 | All footprints are valid and appropriately squared. Overall a good contribution.--- I think that WAY: 1304555865 is too long. Right clicking the background imagery and selecting 'zoom to native resolution' can help in determining the shape, size and orientation of features, because it is the highest resolution image it is possible to see. You can view my edits in Changeset: 158827506---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158793684 | All of these building footprints are valid. Please remember to square the footprnit when appropriate. Know that the roof colour of building can be darker. I recommend zooming out to spot the buildings before zooming in to trace them.
|
|
| 147947170 | WAY: 1254994765 does not appear to be present in the source image, (where the shadows are cast south). The footprint you've added is on the road.
|
|
| 158596241 | Please see changesets 158760888 and 158760984 to see my resolution/ how I mapped it.
|
|
| 158596241 | A good effort given the cloud cover in this imagery. All of these footprints outline buildings, are appropriately squared and are accurate in orientation. They are however generally oversized this can cause some problems when buildings are very close together.---WAY: 1329712789 should be mapped as two seperate building footprints and shares a node with a residential area which it should not do. Hold alt to prevent you cursor snapping to exisitng data and use filters to avoid accidentally editing elements beyond the scope of the project. (access via map data panel).---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158718010 | Welcome to OSM! You are correct to have deleted this POI, if it indeed no longer exists. Groundtruthed contributions are very valuable and so for that reason, and because I have seen it be mistakenly used before, I want to ensure that you understand the difference between the local knowledge and survey tag.--- I'm not suggesting that you haven't checked this before contributing, but the names can make it a little confusing. The source 'survey' is a stronger claim, becuase a user is claiming to have seen something firsthand. The source local knowledge could mean that the user is claiming to have seen it firsthand, but it could also mean that the user who claims it, made the contribution after they heard that 'boots closed' when asking for directions, for example.--- Thank you for your contribution, and providing a useful source and comment.
|
|
| 151842222 | The gabled roofed buildings in this changeset are inaccurate. Depending on how they're lit gabled roofs may have a light and dark side; both should be used when mapping the footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Look at Changeset: 158684248 to see how I mapped it. Hope this helps.
|
|
| 151796559 | A good number of footprints here envelope multiple buildings.---WAY: 1286492972 is inaccurate, becasue you've only mapped the light side of the gabbled roof reference:roof:shape=gabled. When a light source (sun) is perpendicular to the cord line of a gabled roof one side will be darker than the other; both should be used to draw the footprint.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|