OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 151854871 | I think that WAY: 1286821109 & WAY: 1286821110 are invalid footprints.
|
|
| 151855233 | WAY: 1286823792 envelopes a building and part of another. Beware that gabled roofs may have a dark and light side. Please keep this in mind in your future contributions.
|
|
| 151767554 | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery. Beware that buildings like those enveloped by WAY: 1286250850 are likely to be two buildings.
|
|
| 151792618 | The northern footprint is certainly valid and both footprints have been approprately squared. I think that the northern footprint is oversized. You can cross reference this by checking esri imagery. See how I mapped it in Changeset: 158994181. Hope this helps.
|
|
| 151848703 | These footprints are valid but the imagery allows them to be more accurate. check Changeset: 158956046 to see how I mapped it.
|
|
| 151836765 | WAY: 1286728871 appears to be longer in imager and its orientation would be more accurate if it were rotated clockwise a little. Thanks for providing changeset comments by the way.
|
|
| 151837635 | All footprints outline buildings and are appropriately squared. some footpritns envelope multiple buildings e.g. WAY: 1286732060 & WAY: 1286732059. Some building footprints could be more accurate e.g. WAY: 1286732031 & WAY: 1286732034 should be L shaped. Hope this helps.
|
|
| 151837175 | All of these footprints envelope buildings and have been appropriately squared. The accuracy could be slighty greater. Overall a good changeset. --- I think that WAY: 1286730702 is actually L shaped and that WAY: 1286730704 should actually be represented with two footprints. Check Changeset: 158954385 to see how I mapped it.
|
|
| 151799208 | I think that it would be best to map this with two building footprints. Check Changeset: 158954016 to see how I mapped it.
|
|
| 158789788 | The vast majority of footprints in this changeset are valid. The buildings are appropriately squared and are accurate in both shape and orientation. They could be ever so slightly smaller, but this is a minor point. Just bear in mind that squaring the footprint can mdoify the size of the footprint you traced.--- It looks like you took care when tracing these footprints. This is a high quality contribution. Thank you.--- If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158738776 | About half of these footprints are valid. Check Changeset: 158839570 & 158840072. To see how I mapped this using bing imagery. Please press q to square the corners of buildings after tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158738776 | About half of these footprints are valid. Check Changeset: 158839570 & 158840072. To see how I mapped this using bing imagery. Please press q to square the corners of buildings after tagging.
|
|
| 158738776 | About half of these footprints are valid. Check Changeset: 158839570 & 158840072. To see how I mapped this using bing imagery. Please press q to square the corners of buildings after tagging.
|
|
| 153966995 | The tagging of these features is incorrect. Landuse cannot necessarily be determined from aerial imagery. Even if there is a factory building there that doesn't mean that it is currently being used in an industrial capacity. The building footprint should be mapped in either case.--- A building footprint should not be tagged as a pipeline because it is invalid information. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154446042 | Again, please do not copy and paste unless the footprints are actually the same shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158827961 | WAY: 1331434988 appears to envelope multiple buildings, becasue significant shadows are visible in the centre of this footprint and the roofs are many different colours. The shadows are cast north in bing imagery here. Thanks for contributing, hope this helps.
|
|
| 157578213 | Please press q to square your footprints after tagging.
|
|
| 157012768 | you added WAY: 1317698387 over an existing years old building. If you are using fillters do so with care, check that you aren't hiding mapping errors if they pop-up diring data upload. Some footprints like WAY: 1317698388 are oversized because they include the (white) eastern wall visible in off nadir imagery. Thank you for your contribution, hope this helps.
|
|
| 154446526 | Not all of these footprints are valid. A lot of footprints here are inaccurate. Copy and pasting buildings can be valid in situations where building footprints are the same. While I appreciate the idea, these buildings have different footprints and so the footprints should either be drawn from scratch, or modified after pasting so that the footpritns are accurate. Quality > quantity, contribute what you can. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156144987 | This footprint is valid and accurate. It would be nice if you stated what you did (and why when appropriate) in your changeset comment. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|