OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 158452961 | WAY: 1328787838 appears to me to be vegetation; not a building.--- It appears that you moved connected building footprints. Either select all of the connected features and move them simultaneously or unglue/disconnect the features to prevent unwanted geometry changes.--- I corrected the errors in Changeset: 158631711. Use that as a reference.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 133998572 | You used a custom tag here and do not appear to have answered another contributor's question about its meaning.--- The meaning of this custom tag perhaps could have been added to the chnageset comment, so that its meaning can be understood. You should be documenting custom tags that you employ. I could not find a proposal for this tagging scheme on the OSM wiki. Reference Document your custom tags section in osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156313753 | The trees in this changeset could likely have been better mapped using an area.---The building footprints are not very accurate. The building relation you created is incorrect; the buildings here should be tagged individually. Some building footprints erroneously share nodes with other buildings and highways. Buildings and highways should only share common nodes, or overlap in special cases. Use the buildings plugin and hold ctrl when mapping to prevent your cursor from snapping to exisitng elements. I encourage you to reference osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 146752981 | One of the problems with this changeset is that it was not submitted with a comment that's useful to other contributors. No imagery or source has been reported which makes the changeset more difficult to acess and work with.---You have also deleted and redrawn elements that represent the same feature. Please refer to the Good changeset comments and Keep the history sections of osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments I have added the tag building=yes to many of the untagged ways created here in changeset/158590458. This was as part of MR project 49486 and mapping errors generated by Radio Castiao Jr could also be included in MR project 58204, maybe others given the area that Radio Castiao Jr has contributed.
|
|
| 133997119 | I'd like to start off with a couple of positives. The vast majority of individual trees are tagged appropriately and most appear to be valid. You seem to have identified buildings in the imagery and some building footprints are valid.--- There are however several errors in this contribution. There are errors in tagging, geometry, and the changeset itself.--- I recommend that you use the buildings plugin when mapping building footprints. This plugin helps with both tagging and geometry of building footprints, because it will automatically tag and square ways that represent buildings. If you are mapping buildings remotely, then they should be tagged as building=yes. Reference: osm.wiki/Map_features.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 133997119 | Por favor, traduza meus comentários, se necessário. I want to begin by saying that the effort and time you have spent contributing to OSM is appreciated. The following comments are intended to provide you with constructive critisism of your work, so that your further contributions may be more efficient, of a higher quality, and respect the time and effort of other contributors that interact with your contributions. These comments/reviews may come as a shock to you; I recommend that you process them systematically, then upload some small contributions with request for review, to ensure that the quality of your contributions has improved, so that any mistakes you make can be addressed with minimal effort.
|
|
| 154582376 | Footprints; Valid, accurate in shape and orientation, appropriately squared. Good choice of imagery and to align to ESRI to keep common project alignment. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 155006230 | Valid, appropriately squared. I don't think there's enough evidence in the imagery to support mapping this as anything other than a quadrilateral. This could have also been aligned with ESRI to be consistent with the alignment of other features in the project. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156097485 | Valid footprint, appropriately squared, accurate orientation. Slightly oversized. Be aware that low resolution imagery can make features appear larger than they actually and that squaring can change the size of what you draw. Overall a good changeset. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 155138024 | This is a valid footprint that has been appropriately squared. Its orientation is also accurate. It is however, slightly oversized.--- be aware that low resolution imagery can make things appear larger than they actually are and squaring can change the size of the shape you've drawn.--- Overall a good changeset. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158564514 | Welome to OSM. This building footprint is valid and the general shape looks to be correct or close to it, however you should press q after tagging to square the corners of features when appropriate. It is difficult to hand draw exact right angles. The building height appears to be invalid based on imagery and it contradicts the building levels tag value of 5. At least one those values is wrong.---You should only contribute to OSM based on sources with a compatible licence; as far as I'm aware google maps and earth do not fall into this category, and so you should not use them when contributing to OSM.--- Thank you for your contribution, please keep this in mind in future.
|
|
| 156097339 | Thank you for improving the accuracy of the highway in this area.--- Please just keep in mind that when you upload edits you should submit valid changeset comments. In this case you uploaded using the default comment that states you added buildings when you actually modified a highway. ---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156147985 | This footprint is a little oversized, but it is valid and the orientation is accurate. Leave yourself a margin for squaring when tracing features.--- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156886486 | Welcome to OSM. The areas you add represent building footprints and so should represent individual buildings; not groups of them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156147960 | In mapbox you can tell that the shape of WAY: 1313058180 is inaccurate, however I can see why you would map it this way looking at ESRI. Thank you for modifying the waterway in the way you did. By moving its nodes to new positions you did not create an unnecessary new version of the river.
|
|
| 154663143 | The vast majority of buildings are valid and all are appropriately squared. Some are oversized like WAY: 1304896588. The image is taken at an oblique angle so you can see part of the wall (the building actually casts a shadow on its own wall). The roof should be mapped and then moved to the base of the building (where the wall meets the ground). You can see my changes in Changeset: 158523142. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301241 | It appears that you accidentally modified a highway causing the changeset to be much larger. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to nearby elements or filter them out using the map data panel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301241 | It appears that you accidentally modified a highway causing the changeset to be much larger. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to nearby elements or filter them out using the map data panel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301294 | Good choice of imagery. You identified waterways. Before uploading your changes check that the comment is appropriate; in this case you made no mention of mapping waterways. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154289374 | You made a good choice of imagery. This is a valid footprint. This footprint should be squared. Press q after tagging to do this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|