OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 154301365 | You correctly drew the way representing the river in the direction of flow. You can use topo maps to to verify this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301365 | Press q to square building footprints after tagging. Avoid uploading untagged elements as they will not render in OSM. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301537 | These footprints should be squared; press q after tagging. WAY: 1303255173 could be a tree becuase the shadow it casts is significantly larger than the adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301610 | This footprint should be squared, because it is simply more likely to have square corners in reality than to have this shape. The imagery does not provide strong enough evidence that this building has this shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154301645 | Good job, the footprints you've correctly identified buildings in aerial imagery.---The buildings here could be more accurate and should be squared. Press q on your keyboard after tagging an area to do this. You can also see these buildings in mapbox. I rectifiec this in Changeset: 158513673.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156702668 | I resolved this in changesets; 158509853 and 158511229.
|
|
| 156702668 | The biggest problem here is the imagery you decided to use to digitize footprints, because many of these buildings are simply no longer there and so I have had to delete them and modify those who's shape has changed.--- In the imagery you used: All of the footprints are valid and footprints have been appropriately squared. On some occasions you even mapped footprints with more complex footprints.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154396270 | All footprints are valid, and appropriately squared. The changeset comment is accurate. The accuracy of some footprints could be greater, but on the whole this is a good changeset.---
|
|
| 154369893 | A better changeset comment would have been "I added a post office, events venue, and the highways that connect them to the broarder network." Places in OSM tagging refer to settlements like hamlets, villages, towns and cities, and so refering to the features that you added here as places could be confusing for users who only read your comment. |
|
| 154369893 | It got so big becasue the service highways that you added did not connect to pre-existing and unmodified nodes belonging to Pipariya Road thereby modifying it. Changeset bounding boxes envelope the entire area occupied by an element so the size is now based on the length of that segment of Pipariya Road. Consider how you structure you contributions to OSM. Bear this in mind for your future contributions and thank you for what you've contributed thus far. |
|
| 156147899 | The footprints here are valid, but they could be more accurate.--- Firstly, they are oversized, low resolution imagery can make features appear bigger than they are and squaring can change the size somewhat. I recommend that you give yourself a margin for squaring when drawing.--- Secondly the southern footprint's orientation is inaccurate; it should be rotated clockwise ~ 45 degrees. There's a zoom sweet spot where one pixel of imagery coresponds to one pixel on your screen. This is the zoom at which you will see the most accurate orientation of features. Check against mapbox imagery in this area to confirm this. I modified these footprints and uploaded them in Changeset: 158482028. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 157078839 | This footprint is valid, though it should be squared. Press q arter tagging to square the corners of rectilinear features. I modified this footprint and uploaded it using Changeset: 158481640 for you to have as a reference. There is a zoom sweet spot in imagery where one pixel in imagery is mapped onto one pixel on your screen. Using this sweet spot helped me to determine the building's shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 157079035 | All of these footprints outline buildings, but they could be more accurate. The features I flagged envelope several buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154724725 | The changeset comment you have provided is missleading. It mentions mapping buildings but you mapped highways. This can make changesets more cumbersome to work with for other mappers. Please check that the default comment is appropriate before you upload your changes. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154296675 | These footprints are valid and appropriately squared, but they are oversized. Accurate footprinst are important, because they are used for population estimates. Oversized buildings will also likely lead ot overmapps and common nodes in dense areas. map ~95% of the roof sized to give yourself margin when squaring. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 156594149 | All buildings in this changeset are valid and mostly accurate. The footprints are appropriatelly squared.--- The orientation of WAY: 1315437619 could be adjusted slightly clockwise, but this is minor. Overall a good changeset. ---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 158352043 | While most of the building footprints in this changeset are valid, some are not, and many are inaccurate.--- For instance WAY: 1328224624 is oversized and the actual building has a footprint more complex than a rectangle. WAY: 1328224660 is actually a C shaped building. WAY: 1328224686 appears to represent a courtyard.--- Accuracy is improtant, because building footprints are used for population estimates, and accurate building shapes help those using the map to identify buildings.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154290326 | Most of the building footprints you added are valid, and you also mapped buildings wih more complex shapes however, the footprints are composed of excess nodes. You only need to click on the corners of buildings. You made a good decision to use Mapbox as an imagery source in this area, but check the primary source before saving your changes, becasue you added buildings that are no longer there. Please press q to square the corners of rectilinear buildings after tagging the area you draw. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 154492366 | Well done! You certainly improved the accuracy of existing footprints in the area and added valid footprins that have been appropriately squared. You have made some errors however; Most buildings are somewhat oversized. Map around 95% of the roof size to give yourself some margin for squaring. you represented two buildings with one footprint WAY: 1304110355. You can tell because of the different roof colours. WAY: 1231355982 was added using older imagery and no longer exists so it should be deleted, not modified. Thank you for your contribution.
|
|
| 156886301 | These building footprints are inaccurate. The accuracy of your mapping is important for those using the map and the data. A lot of these buildings are oversized and may skew population estimates. The accurate shape of buildings is important for identification. Would you be able to tell which building was which if you were using a map in this area? Thank you for your contribution. I encourage you to attend a mapathon. check https://osmcal.org/ to find one.
|