Friendly_Ghost's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136231978 | Is this an address that customers can visit, or is this an online-only business? Also, please see the Wiki documentation for the correct syntax of opening hours in OSM. |
|
| 136234191 | Hi. Are you sure that the company is located in the middle of the park? |
|
| 128014885 | Hoi Kogacarlo, Waarom heb je een duplicaat gemaakt van way/951750296 ? |
|
| 134895531 | I re-read osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information#Who_has_a_Right_to_Privacy? and it seems you're right. My bad. |
|
| 82113110 | Address tags are wrong here either way, because bus stops shouldn't appear in address databases and no postman (or woman) will deliver mail to a bus stop. |
|
| 134895531 | See also osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:person_(rewrite) |
|
| 82113110 | 1.35% is quite insignificant. Tagging the street explicitly is also redundant, because the bus stop already has a spatial relation with the nearest street. |
|
| 82113110 | Hi. Why does node/3048004342 have addr:street tags? |
|
| 131039069 | That Wiki page you're citing states: "GOST 7.67 is GOST standard for country codes and codes of Russian federal subjects (regions)." This may include Crimea under the OSMF's decision from 2014, but I don't understand how these codes are relevant for other regions in Ukraine. Following SomeoneElse's statement in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-activities-in-active-war-zones-in-ukraine/7221/36, I think we should follow the local (Ukrainian) community. |
|
| 131039069 | "it's a ref:* namespace that you can skip in your algorithms, it takes up almost no space and doesn't violate osm rules." This is no reason to have data in OSM. I can add "Friendly_Ghost:ref=*" to all objects I'm interested in, and no one will like that either. What do these ref:ru tags even mean? |
|
| 133616553 | You're welcome. If you look at the history of way/679622365 you see that the aerodrome has been this way for most of the time. Making it a multipolygon was probably a mistake by JB956. |
|
| 133544673 | You're welcome. You know, "We off" still doesn't say anything about when the place is open and most apps and websites won't recognise "We off" as "open on Thursday to Tuesday". It's better to have opening hours like "Th-Tu 09:00-17:00; We off" (or whatever timestamps are applicable). |
|
| 129166812 | Hello. Is node/3368129640 closed or did you mean "closed on Wednesdays"? |
|
| 133193345 | Yeah, fair point. This guy doesn't seem to be working with the broader Ukrainian community. |
|
| 133193345 | Hi Mazda05, I see you're reverting the work of avinet_ua. Out of curiosity; what is your opinion on this user's translation edits in general? |
|
| 133118561 | Hello. I have a few questions/remarks about the addresses here: addr:country tags should only contain the 2-letter code. Building numbers (عمارة رقم ) should not be part of the addr:housenumber tag. What does addr:daïra mean? Why are there several places with addr:housenumber=0 ? addr:city seems to be tagged in an inconsistent way: I found TAGHZOUT, Taghzout ⵜⴰⵖⵣⵓⵜ تغزوت and تغزوت. Which one is correct? |
|
| 131472966 | Hoi FSC73, Ook hier vraag ik me af waarom je een prima in kaart gebrachte parkeerplaats om moest zetten in langsparkeren. Zie ook een forumdiscussie uit oktober over het in kaart brengen van sportparken en -verenigingen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sportparken-en-name-tags/3904 |
|
| 132032928 | Hoi FSC73, Waarom maak je hier van een enkele parkeerplaats allemaal losse stukjes langsparkeren? |
|
| 132258734 | I added the picture as wikimedia_commons tag in changeset/132386114. |
|
| 130961841 | As you say, the walls do not enclose the city. Therefore, they are functionally different from city walls. I agree with you that the barrier=wall tag would be wrong and too generic to use here. That said, deliberately mistagging all structures as walls is not a workable solution either. Walls are usually regarded as linestrings, yet you have added the tag to OSM objects that are supposed to be closed ways (areas) instead. This leads to misrepresentations of the structures, for example at the tenailles and the redoubt. Also, not every section is a separate fort. All sections are parts of Fort Adams, which, in accordance with OSM's "One feature, one OSM element" only be mapped once. How is way/1127882118 not a duplicate of relation/11532810? |