Hi Carlos, does this Point of Interest (POI) 'CMCM' stand for a more expanded name? the use of abbreviations is dissuaded on OpenStreetMap - osm.wiki/Name#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

Hi Supaplex,

I could not help but notice this changeset, I was hoping that you could help me out with something, I sometimes designate POIs (Points of Interest) in both Traditional and Simplified Chinese, although, I designated them both under the (name:zh) tag

way/365758294#map=19/-8.84768/13.23508&layers=G

however, I do not know what tags to use to input either one seperately, do you know what the tags are for both language scripts?

I have no idea what it is that I am doing that keeps breaking the coastline

Hi Xander Slow, some of the points of interest that you added in this changeset appear to reference someone's personally identifiable information, you are not supposed to add such details to the map | ola Xander Slow, alguns dos pontos de interesse que você adicionou neste conjunto de alterações parecem fazer referência a informações pessoalmente identificáveis de alguém, não deve-se adicionar esse tipo de detalhes ao mapa

parabéns 👍🏿, por favor considera fazer ainda mais, há muito trabalho para fazer e poucos colaboradores locais a contribuir

Obrigado pela sua consideração

ola Vlademiro,

obrigado por esclarecer a situação, vais ter que desculpar-me pelo o atraso em responder a sua mensagem, tive outras tarefas empilhadas uma por cima de outra, foi por esse motivo que levou-me algum tempo antes voltar a abordar esta questão

com base nas informações que você forneceu e outros detalhes que adicionaste ao mapa neste local, levou-me a supor que esta área é um estabelecimento de polícia, por essa rasão, decidi fazer o seguinte, criei um perímetro designado com a etiqueta ‘area:police’, que apresentará a área delimitada como um limite preenchido em vermelho, de modo a se destacar visualmente no mapa, também adicionei restrições de acesso às vias de serviço que levam ao complexo usando a etiqueta ‘access:destination', que deve desviar todas as trajectórias de navegação para vias de acesso público adjacente, isto for, a menos se a área em questão seja o destino pretendido

Hello Parsamparham and mueschel, I wanted to chime in on the access tags that I added to the ways in question in this changeset

mueschel, you will have to excuse me for not resolving and getting back to you on the issue brought up in the following changeset [ changeset/61248171 ], I had the intention of doing so, the problem is that I have various issues pield one on top of another, that is why it takes me a while to resolve certain issues

[ https://i.imgur.com/aWIaDgp.png ] - this image represents the information that is displayed on a traffic sign along this road, what the sign essentially informs the driver is that 'public transport' is 'prohibited' from using the 'rightmost lane' during 'weekdays from 05:00-22:00', the same lane is otherwise used as a no parking lane during the periods in which the access condition is being enforced, one of the reasons I wanted to find the appropriate tag to use to represent what the traffic sign enforces is because this same traffic sign is located on other roads as well, as mueschel denoted in the aforementioned changeset, the access condition that should be used to represent the restriction displayed on the traffic sign should be - 'bus:lanes:conditional = |||designated @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:00)', 'access:lanes:conditional = |||no @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:00)'

the following is the message that I intended on posting in regards to the access condition tags I wanted reviewed in the changeset of the hyperlink mentioned above:

Thanks for confirming that for me mueschel, I was not sure whether the way I composed that tag was correct, some of the articles published on OpenStreetMaps' wiki describe concepts in ways that I sometimes have a hard time rapping my head around, I wish the examples were represented more visually so that I could better comprehend them, I also wish that the iD editor would allow the user to designate tags through a more intuitively visual interface rather than through the use of tags (similar to how the relation:restriction tool works in the iD editor - https://i.imgur.com/hUkb4kf.png), that way the user could have a more visual representation of what they want to convey

aside from this issue, do either of you know of a way to omit certain GPX traces from the Public GPS Traces repository, some are of dubious quality, others no longer represent the current state of a road

Ola Vladimiro, ao analisar este conjunto de mudanças que tu enviaste, reparei que você eliminou alterações que eu adicionei anteriormente, a razão pela qual tenho dificuldade em compreender, as alterações que fiz nessa área pareciam-me auto-evidentes vendo que foram baseadas em o que pode ser observado na camada de imagem, podes esclarecer-me sobre a justificativa que fundamentou sua escolha de eliminações na imagem que está localizada na seguinte hiperligação:

https://i.imgur.com/AIHPJx2.jpg

Além disso, eu aconselharia a não utilizar 'Bing World Imagery' como uma camada de fundo sob o qual basear rastros, na minha experiência, as imagens fornecidas estão, em alguns casos, desactualizadas e menos representativas das dimensões de elementos como existem na terra em comparação a outras camadas disponíveis

I spotted something amiss in this changeset - https://i.imgur.com/EfynEJj.jpg

okay 👍🏿

I corrected the information that you added to the point of interest in this changeset with those that you added to another point of interest that you created in the following changeset [ changeset/61914224 ] which contained essentially the same information and location, I then deleted the latter | Eu corrigi as informações que você adicionou ao ponto de interesse neste conjunto de mudanças com aquelas que você adicionou a outro ponto de interesse que você criou no seguinte conjunto de mudanças - [changeset/61914224] que continha essencialmente a mesma informação e localização doque o antigo, eliminei o último

how about adding the house numbers and the names of each street in that area so that I will not have to

Hi gsmiro, the building you designated as a 'hanger' is actually the airport terminal, there are not aircraft stored or repaired in this building, a more suitable designation would be 'aeroway=terminal', aeroway=* | Ola gsmiro, o prédio que você designou como 'barracão' é na verdade o terminal do aeroporto, não há aeronaves armazenadas ou consertadas neste prédio, uma designação mais adequada seria 'aeroway=terminal', osm.wiki/Pt:Key:aeroway

the informal neighbourhood that used to be in 'Chicala' has already been leveled, the aerial imagery provided by 'Digital Globe Premium' is outdated

Ola Luís figueiredo, os detalhes que você incluiu neste conjunto de mudanças parece ser em referência de informações pessoalmente identificáveis de alguém (especificamente a um 'Primo Júlio Inglês'), se for esse o caso, eu gostaria de informar que não deve se adicionar informações pessoais ao mapa

Hi moviebuffAS, I noticed that you changed the restriction of the following node in this changeset from 'no_left_turn' to 'no_right_turn' (that was actually wrong, but as I will describe in the following, the restriction on the node was wrong to begin with) - node/4328313491#map=20/-8.81130/13.25542&layers=G, reviewing the changes that you made to my prior edits in this changeset allowed me to realise that I made a poor choice in representing the correct restriction at the junction where the aforementioned node is located, the restriction along this way prohibits the execution of 'U-turns' at this junction from Rua Ndumduma heading west to the same heading east via the small portion of road connecting the two, I erroneously represented the no_u_turn restriction by designating the 'nodes' at this junction with a 'no_left_turn' restriction, however, left turns 'are' permitted at this junction (for those leaving Rua Ndumduma to enter 'Cristiano dos Santos'), although, as mentioned before, what is 'not' permitted are 'U-turns' (the following hyperlink shows a Mapiliary image of the same street, just a little further along) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=rZVMcY6ruwN8U_9bE0z0xQ&focus=photo&lat=-8.81115719666667&lng=13.25273875138896&z=17 (if you consider all of the possible manoeuvres that can take place at this junction, you will figure a node is poorly suited to correctly represent the no_u_turn restriction that is in force at this junction), ultimately, I used iD's 'relation:restriction' tool to properly designate what the street sign instructs the driver not to do and the same for the opposite direction https://i.imgur.com/hUkb4kf.png, I wrote this comment because I thought it was something you should be made aware of

I cannot say I agree with your choices of edits in this changeset - https://i.imgur.com/EIla4dU.jpg

argh Giovanni, avete collegato i nodi del Comune di Belas a quelli del litorale, sarà un mal di testa per staccarli quando sarà necessario apportare una modifica

thanks for pointing that out, I need to bear that in mind from now on