Hi lukfunk, I was reviewing edits made in the city of Luanda, this one in particular caught my eye, are you sure that the embassy of the United Arab Emirates is located at this location?

after reviewing the sources, I realised how I made this mistake, before I had split the way in half, I applied the 'incline=-8%' tag based on this sign located at the beginning of the way [ https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=NKB1X0QH8TyiUSZTMeyulQ&focus=photo ], however, as another 'steep incline' sign is located further along the same way [ https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=mDHLxj_RyiOy5-Ai_JGEMQ&focus=photo ] I decided to split the aforementioned way and add an 'incline=-11%' tag with complete disregard to the incline tag that I had added to the way before I had split it, I kept the 'incline=-8%' tag for the portion of the highway where it applies but removed it from the other portion of the same highway where the 'incline=11%' applies, thanks for pointing this out to me again, I probably wouldn't have noticed otherwise 👍🏼

whopsy doodle, I think, one is in reference to the uphill incline and the other is decline, let me check my sources, thanks for pointing this out

Hi Gullivax, I tend to review changesets made in Angola, your edits sparked my curiosity in particular, may I know where you procured the information used to establishment POI? it does not corroborate with my own

this node was established by a new user mostly likely for the purpose of testing the iD editor, I was led to believe that they had no real intention of making a genuine contribution given the nature of the edit

this node was established by a new user most likely for the purpose of testing out the iD editor, I am led to believe this is was not meant to be a genuine contribution given the nature of the edit

it was actually a shipping container

'5 months ago', you will have to excuse me, I have had a tab openned to this hyperlink for months now, I only just managed to get things together to address it

regarding the 'maxheight' tag, an exerpt from an OpenStreetMap wiki article about it says - "For a bridge, the maxheight tag should be set on the way going under the bridge. Only tag the section of the way where the maxheight road signs apply. If there are none, only the approximate section of the way which is under the bridge should be tagged with maxheight" - [ maxheight=* ]

regarding the covered=yes tags, thank you for pointing that out, I read the wiki article about it and removed all of the tags from the ways where the tag does not apply

the name of this city was changed from 'Moçâmedes' in 1985 to 'Namibe' and then back to 'Moçâmedes' in 2016

(what on Earth is the government of the country doing)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_nunciature

Hi DanaeBrookCanyon,

I thought the alignments you made in this changeset was a little crocked, I decided to rectify them - changeset/75590625

Olá, José,

bem-vindo e congratulações pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap, é animador receber novos colaboradores, há muito poucos actualmente contribuindo para o desenvolvimento do mapa de Angola, poderia usar tantos quantos estiverem dispostos a contribuir

eu frequentemente reviso as contribuições feitas na cidade de Luanda e depois de analisar sua contribuição, não pude deixar de notar que você cometeu um pequeno erro, a localização que você estabeleceu no mapa é de uma 'área residencial', mas você a designou como um 'supermercado'

osm.wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
osm.wiki/Pt:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket

é sempre ideal designar todos os elementos adicionados ao mapa usando a designação mais apropriada, aplicações como OsmAnd utilizar designação para melhor fornecer informações precisas para seus usuários

se precisares de ajuda, terei todo o gosto em ajudar

Hi stevenLAD,

I simply wanted to let you know that I decided to reestablished a primary link road that wraps around 'Monumento do Soldado Desconhecido', I had previously established the road at that location but it was removed in this changeset

I felt reassured to do so because as I was reviewing street-level imagery that had been uploaded to Mapillary, I came across a sequence of images which clearly shows the primary link road in question, signs in the vecinity also reinforce the same aswell - [ https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-8.812694444444444&lng=13.230883333333333&z=17&pKey=iGI3emJ5WNjrune4RhTx-Q&focus=photo&signs=true&points=true&mapFeature%5B%5D=object--fire-hydrant&mapFeature%5B%5D=object--manhole&mapFeature%5B%5D=object--traffic-light--general-upright ]

regarding other concerns, you will have to excuse me for not having gotten back to some of your previous messages (I can sometimes be quite bad at that), the browser tabs where the messages are contained are lost among mirriad of other open tabs, I will get to them eventually

are you sure that isn't a container? | 你確定它不是一個容器嗎？

Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap mapeamento de luanda,
pressumindo que o nó representando um parque chamado 'ñ exixte' que você estabeleceu neste conjunto de alterações, foi feito assim como um meio para você testar a interface web iD e não como uma edição legítima, você se importaria se eu fosse excluí-lo?

access=customers

Olá António Domingos Dinis, ao rever as alterações feitas em Luanda, reparei que cometeste um ligeiro erro neste conjunto de alterações, tomei a liberdade de o corrigir [ changeset/73645724 ]

Hi ne17sg, based on the alteration that you decided to make in this changeset, as I was the one who added them in the first place, I took the liberty of removing all multiligual name tags from the nodes representing train stations that you edited in this changeset, I notice that you decided to remove some multiligual name tags entirely from some nodes and not others

Hi map Óptimo, upon reviewing recent changes to the map of Luanda, I could not help but notice that you changed the house number of a building that I established inside 'Cajueiro Condominium', I went to meticulous lengths to ascertain that the house numbers in that neighbourhood were correct, although I am fairly sure that they all are, I could be wrong, it is for that reason that I wanted to ask you to clarify to me about what led to your decision to change it? if it was a question of it being a wrong designation, you changed the number of the house but yet you chose not to alter any of the other ones to conform to the one that you changed, aside from that, I would also like to make it clear, if that is not already the case, that the house number of any building constitutes public information and is not considered confidential | Olá mapa Óptimo, ao rever as recentes alterações ao mapa de Luanda, não pude deixar de reparar que você mudou o número da casa de um edifício que estabeleci dentro do 'Condomínio Cajueiro', esforcei-me meticulosamente para verificar se os números da casa naquele bairro estavam correctos, embora esteja bastante certo de que todos estão, eu poderia estar errado, é por isso que queria pedir-lhe que me esclarecesse sobre o que levou à sua decisão de o alterar? se era uma questão de ser uma designação errada, você mudou o número da casa, mas ainda assim você optou por não alterar qualquer um dos outros para se conformar com o que você alterou, além disso, eu também gostaria de tornar claro, se não for já o caso, que o número da casa de qualquer edifício constitui informação pública e não é considerada confidencial

obrigado por teres corrigido o meu erro 👍🏻