DaveF's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144342090 | Please revert this changeset.
|
|
| 144378005 | It doesn't have to be related to the individual object.
Wikidata has a poor user interface & is always at least one extra, unnecessary action.
Have you removed similar URLs from other shops & facilities? |
|
| 144378005 | Instead of removing them could you replace them with the generic home page? |
|
| 141916687 | Hi
|
|
| 144187323 | Hi
|
|
| 143662421 | You could have replaced it with the correct URL. |
|
| 143305535 | Hi
& also remove the existing linear platform. |
|
| 143335149 | Hi
|
|
| 143354508 | Hi
Do you know if this bin is still there?
|
|
| 143211080 | Hi
These should be bus stops. The 'train' is on pneumatic tyres with no track, Could you update them please. |
|
| 143175652 | Please don't introduce inaccuracies into the OSM database. |
|
| 142670251 | Overpass. |
|
| 142670251 | My concern isn't with quantity or how they were added, but quality. brand:wikipedia is a useful tag for filtering businesses to check name spelling. There's no direct duplication. |
|
| 142670283 | Seeing as the Wikipedia tags are all in the UK, including the en tags seems appropriate. Unsure what you mean by "In order to get the same article in another language, you'd need to go via wikidata anyway." as the different languages are listed on the wikipedia sidebar. Wikidata does not duplicate Wikipedia data. It is completely separate. If information is added/removed in either it doesn't update the other. As no reason for removing Wikipedia tags has been given, I'll be reverting shortly. |
|
| 142670283 | Again, doesn't explain the need to remove Wikipedia.
|
|
| 142670283 | That doesn't explain the need to remove the Wikipedia tag.
In Wikipedia the language selection is at the top. |
|
| 142670283 | What is the purpose of the edit?
I'd prefer to see the removal of wikidata tags whose pages are a poorly laid out hotchpotch of non information. Many appear to have been created solely so they be added to OSM. |
|
| 142135466 | You've misread the sign. & misunderstood the situation. It's attached to an *open* gate. The footpath you claim to be a bridleway is behind it. It only has kissing gate access https://snipboard.io/QZFqRJ.jpg The actual permissive bridleway is this one:
|
|
| 142135466 | If permissive, then you should use the permissive_bridleway tag: |
|
| 142135466 | If so, it would great if you could update the barriers. |