What evidence do you have of that? Did you take a photo?

It's designated as a footpath on the latest BathNES data & the barriers were all kissing gates when I last walked it.

Hi
What evidence have you that this is a bridleway?

Hi
It would be useful if you could correct that misinformation on the forum to prevent it happening to others.

This is also a duplicate.
node/11222291400#map=19/51.53686/-0.12787

You clearly not checked at all. This changeset requires reversion.

node/7159162454

What mad you think there wasn't already a station node at St Pancras?
node/3662847634

As you wanted to change the value why didn't you do it?

node/11195534037

Hi
Is this atm inside the newsagents, or in the wall of the closed bank?

Instead of removing tags why don't you update & improve them?

Hi
"Which should be shown here?"

Good question. When there are restrictions, such as fences stiles & bridges, I map to the real world as we don't want people falling into waterways.
If it's across open land I tend to map as the definitive PROW. However I've had a couple of cases where old zig-zag paths were aligned with field boundaries which had long since been removed. Mapping it as anything but a straight route across the larger field would have been ridiculous.

If the land owner has made sweeping changes it might be worth enquiring with the local authority if it was with their knowledge.

Hi again
If possible please retain valid existing ways, if their accuracy requires amending it's possible to unstitch them from existing features & to realign them.

Their history is useful for reference.

way/141250603/history

Hi
Why have you removed the Southern section of this public right of way (BRAD89)?
way/61744405#map=17/51.35603/-2.25543

https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=fec7fbd3-bd5a-4785-88a8-fe66e2928af3&cp=51.355482%7E-2.256874&lvl=16.9&sty=s&style=s

Oh & apologies for the terseness in my OP. I thought sent you a previous changeset comment explaining in more detail, but appears not to have registered.

changeset/140183021

I'm unsure as I never use these apps primarily because they appear, as in this case, to create more problems than they solve.

Hi Your edit appears to have caused a split in the NCN 4 cycle route. Could you take a look at it please.

way/1203094564

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318929

Hi
And another NCN 4 split:
way/1190452939/history#map=19/51.40292/-1.33052

Hi
Another NCN4 split

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318928

way/1190685472/history

Is there a reason only the NCN relation was deleted?

Hi Your Cotham Updates appear to have split NCN 4. Could you take a look please.

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318928

Hi
By amend this you caused a split in NCN 4 cycle route. Could you please fix. way:way/824110979#map=18/51.57161/-3.43448

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318930