I'm not familiar with the business, but from the signs visible in Bing Streetside, it looks like "Red Line Coins" is more like a "collectibles shop" than a "currency exchange".

I already fixed the multiple-coverage outlines ones I saw. The clearest example would probably be way/1005616535#map=19/46.41575/-117.04922 where the outline originally covered the two buildings to the north. If you use Esri Clarity imagery or view things from the side using Bing Streetside imagery, it's clear that it's two houses and a detached garage.

If you want to see the changes I made, it's changeset/114160231 (OSMCha lets you view the changes in the context of imagery at https://osmcha.org/changesets/114160231/).

You turned Okanogan County into a river. I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future.

Could you please be more careful in your checking? You had two buildings overlapping driveways, and about three dozen cases of a building outline covering more than one building.

The upper trail network was completely re-worked in the past year, so some of the Strava heatmap tracks are stale (I think Strava uses a three-year history).

When I was surveying the area a month ago, I ran out of daylight before being able to check more than the junction between the Quinnamose-Saltese segment and the California Creek and Moonshine trails, but I think your routing is mostly accurate. However, when you deleted the stub trail I'd added, you discarded the surface information and access restrictions (and I think the access restrictions are different for the Mica Peak and Liberty Lake segments).

The small trail segment you added near the west end of the Quinnamose-Saltese segment (way/1005076838) was heavily overgrown with brush, and I suspect one of the tracks you extended (way/432963144) is similar.

I think this needs to be reverted. At least one of the Mica Peak trails you added doesn't exist, and I've got my doubts about a second one.

Where did you get the routing of the "Etter Ranch Access Trail" from? I went hiking there last Saturday, and while the lower section is pretty much spot-on (except for the name), the upper section bears no resemblance to reality.

Are you sure about those trails you added? Only one of them corresponds to a junction I noted in an on-the-ground survey.

General practice in OpenStreetMap is to put the most-common name in the "name" field: we map the world as it is, not as we wish it was.

Assuming the Puyallup tribe still uses "Tahoma" as the name of the mountain, it should go in either the "name:lut" field (if you're sure that it's the original Lushootseed name), or "name:sal" if you're not sure which Salishan language it's from.

Most of the relations seem to have come through okay, though there was some weirdness in the Bus 63 route master relation that I fixed.

The problem with this changeset is that when you split US-2 at the intersection, you didn't bring *any* of the road attributes over to the new one-way segments -- not even the name of the road.

Have they finished re-building the bridge? Last I heard, construction wasn't scheduled to be finished until sometime next year.

You appear to have merged five different features in Noxon to produce a single post office/church/museum/town/fire station. What happened?

OpenStreetMap is about mapping what's there, not what we wish was there.

Not every use of the name "Forest" is wrong. You removed the name from two roads, a building, and a city district.

I've reverted this changeset.

It would be useful to know what roads have been changed and why, particularly when you're bumping a road's importance by two grades, or adding a major road that doesn't show up in any aerial imagery.

Could you please be more careful? When you updated the alignment, you deleted the lane count, speed limit, and other useful information from the existing section of road.

Four errors:

1) A patio roof mapped as a separate building.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) A building outline showing a courtyard that doesn't exist.
4) A temporary tent mapped as a permanent building.

*Sigh*

Is there a reason why you added pedestrian crossings in the middle of nowhere in Canada and the United States?

You've tagged a power line as a primary road here. I've undone it, but please be more careful in the future.

I've reverted this changeset.