I've reverted this changeset. Just like last time, the things you deleted were correctly labeled as private driveways.

Two of the three things you deleted were marked as "private driveway", not "road". The correct thing to do would have been to mark the third one as a private driveway as well.

The "description" field is intended for information that doesn't fit in the structured tags, such as what sort of real estate services are offered. It's not a place to write a promotional blurb for your business.

Three errors:

1) Removal of "building=apartments" tags from two buildings.
2) Mapping four buildings as one.
3) A building outline is about 25% larger than the building.

Three errors:

1) A building missing a quarter of its outline.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) Three buildings mapped as one.

Two errors:

1) A building missing a corner
2) Two buildings mapped as one.

When used carefully, inspecting each candidate building against appropriate imagery to ensure that it (1) exists and (2) is traced properly, RapID is an accepted tool.

When using it as you are, importing buildings at rates in excess of one per second, it falls solidly under the import guidelines.

And shifting the burden of error checking onto me is unacceptable. It takes about five minutes to inspect each changeset, or longer if I need to fix anything. The 600 or so changesets you've made in the past day will take me about a month to review if everything is perfect; given the number of errors I've found so far, three to four months is a more reasonable estimate.

Please read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines and the rest of osm.wiki/Category:Import_Policy -- the standard for imports is "guilty until proven innocent".

I'd prefer not to revert it myself -- the Data Working Group has better tools and more experience than I do.

The change I feel necessary is to revert everything you've done since changeset #111471825 as an undiscussed import. Do you agree?

Which renderer are you using that is so incredibly broken that it ignores some building types?

The correct thing to do is to fix the renderer, not break the map.

Is there a reason why you think that Maplewood Gardens, The Academy, Altura, and The Highline shouldn't be apartment buildings, or is it just that RapID is allergic to classifying building types?

You're clearly not spending enough, if any, time reviewing things. One of the "buildings" in this changeset is a travel trailer, and another only vaguely resembles the actual structure on the ground.

Please stop.

Please stop adding low-quality scribbles to the map.

Please don't. We're supposed to be getting a much better set of building outlines to import from in the near future.

What sort of a business is a "Chris O'Doherty - Windermere"? It's useful to tag that so people can find it when searching by type, not just when searching by name.

It would be nice if you explained *why* you're changing the road classification. The last person to do so did.

You've changed the official name of the United States to "ur=ریاست ہائے متحدہ". Do you plan to fix this?

What sort of a thing is "Pandora"? I'm pretty sure that "park" isn't the correct tag for it.

I've noticed a few errors in this changeset:

* Where southbound Ash Street divides in two, both sides of the split are roads, and both of them go by the name "Ash Street".
* There's a similar issue where southbound Maple Street comes off the bridge: both pieces prior to the merge are roads known as "Maple Street".
* 4th Avenue west of Maple isn't an arterial: the speed limit is 25 mph and cross streets don't have stop signs. This means it should be tagged as "unclassified", not "tertiary".

I'm also not sure the classification of Sprague Way is correct: yes, it's the primary connection between two major streets, but it is not itself a major street.

Really damn minor state route.