OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
85204571

culvert seems more likely by a lot...also please use descriptive changeset comments, nobody knows what yours means.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85204571

85158321

Not a great first edit but no big deal, I'll still give it a B+ for effort. I think I've fixed it up if you want to take a look on the map now.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85158321

84709358

OK, looks like in this changeset, you deleted the boundary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84709358

84709358

Is this no longer the Ponca City Country Club?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84709358

85105836

Not all data consumers assume oneway=yes on junction=roundabout (or even consume junction=roundabout).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85105836

84952026

i'm confused what that changeset description means.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84952026

83693276

Why map only part of the driveway when you can map the whole thing?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83693276

83696796

OK, so if a left turn lane crosses the median to the other side, then that way is no longer oneway=yes...
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83696796

83721559

Looks like a lot of intersections on 1st Street got shifted east after they were previously aligned...did you blind smash the straighten button or actually check intersection locations?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83721559

83721559

Looks like a lot of intersections on 1st Street got shifted east after they were previously aligned...did you blind smash the straighten button or actually check intersection locations?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83721559

83718294

This isn't a military training area, it's a civilian police department one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83718294

83502783

Not bad for a first edit.
Take a look at https://osmcha.org/changesets/83719853 for a comparison, I think that's what you were going for.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83502783

83556856

Smaller changesets of more limited geographic scope are much easier to QA than ones covering a wide geographic scope such as entire continents and oceans.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83556856

83702697

A bit more attention to detail would be appreciated. Compare this changeset to changeset/83718504 if you would. Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83702697

83706854

I've gone through and updated the tracing a bit to better reflect what's on the ground in changeset/792906022.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83706854

83646446

Not bad, but not great, either. Be detail oriented when it comes to providing geometry. Also, avoid abbreviations in addresses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83646446

83654960

Not sure what the point was in removing service=driveway on a driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83654960

83572447

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/83653565 where the changeset comment is: Spam removal.

83338207

For addr:unit you can just put "C". Otherwise not a bad first edit. Welcome!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83338207

83085149

I wouldn't consider that accurate lane tagging then.