OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
69199484

Not sure which building this belongs to but I definitely question the copyright of the geocoder used.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69199484

69190266

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69252115 where the changeset comment is: Removing vandalism (profanity tagging).

69180401

Which imagery were you using?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69180401

69158146

Names are not descriptions, but I updated the tagging for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69158146

69157052

Fixed the tagging on that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69157052

69144589

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69218972 where the changeset comment is: Reverting SEO spam.

69007080

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69027991 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.

68860083

Some useful changeset comments would help with QA.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68860083

68876347

You're kinder to spammers with questionable geocoding sources than i am.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68876347

68713384

You can leave off all the access tags there, highway=footway already implies foot=yes and all other modes no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68713384

68797795

This should probably be ref=CR S4112 and noname=yes in that case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68797795

68771740

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/68776930 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of mass deletion by new mapper that can't be readily verified. Changeset also purports to be changing a statue but changeset spans a whole continent and statue itself has really, really unlikely address information included.

68712494

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/68776853 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of mass deletion by new mapper that can't be readily verified.

68640233

Please avoid allcaps in names, as well as abbreviations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68640233

68275258

osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68275258

68275244

Might want to doublecheck that, since Oklahoma Avenue intersecting itself seems unlikely. Also please use mixed case on proper nouns and spell out Avenue; it's easier for machines to create contractions than to figure out what they're supposed to mean.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68275244

67927143

You can leave off the "area" part and just call it Hope Crossing Playground
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67927143

67755553

access tags are generally necessary for barriers, default is "no" otherwise.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67755553

67624233

It's good, just wasn't 100% sure on what was going on there.

67624233

Curious why you removed all the parking aisles?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67624233