OpenStreetMap
Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 61367366 | Decentish geometry here (better than attaching to the highway by a long shot). No abbreviations in names, please.
|
|
| 61450453 | I get that there's a lot of ponds around but I don't see one here.
|
|
| 61418960 | That's not a track, that's a drain.
|
|
| 61419015 | Not sure if all of these are Euchee Creek or unnamed feeders.
|
|
| 61419099 | Waterways point downstream, not upstream.
|
|
| 61419157 | Landuses should go to the edge of the landuse and not attach to highways. This is considerably easier in JOSM than id.
|
|
| 61441719 | As well travelled as it is, it's also not particularly built for it. We're mapping for characteristic, not VMT. |
|
| 61441719 | Likewise, driveways are not highway=residential, they're highway=service. |
|
| 61441719 | Just noticed this...I'm very familiar with this hill and these roads and tracks, 101st and 193rd is unequivocablly not a primary. |
|
| 61441719 | Driveways can be more accurately mapped as highway=service, service=driveway, surface=whatever-the-surface-is.
|
|
| 61441904 | Is this a pond or a swimming pool?
|
|
| 61308840 | Importance to the state usually warrants a minimum of secondary, but major urban arterials can also be primary. Generally speaking, cities in Oklahoma (especially the ones that fall into the top 2% largest cities in America by population) are very reliable in giving the highest significance roads at least 5 lanes, the next order down four lanes, and tertiaries 2 or 3 lanes. How major boulevards in at least the largest urban areas aren't of major statewide significance and minor national significance is definitely debatable. I believe downgrading these boulevards at least partially downplays the context of the ways in question: They're some of the busiest Oklahoma has. I'm also curious where you're getting the "whole road" concept from instead of between significant junctions or major change in characteristic for the way, which is the general norm, especially when roads in Oklahoma can go on for dozens or hundreds of miles, changing context multiple times along the way. |
|
| 61308840 | Not quite sure how a five lane road works out as secondary?
|
|
| 61246497 | No problem. If you can use JOSM, that opens up a lot more imagery versus using the id installation on the main website. You can play around until you find one that has the clearest and most up to date view of your area, but you may have to justify it to line up if it's off quite a bit. Taking a lot of GPX traces (I routinely go around with Osmand automatically logging every trip) will help determine where the ways really are to help line things up. |
|
| 61270712 | Thanks for the fixup!
|
|
| 61246497 | Probably no name on these in reality; it's perfectly acceptable for an unnamed road to have no name tag, but I'd probably change the name tag to description in this case. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
|
| 61126316 | Alright, sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for updating the speed limits. |
|
| 61126316 | Google Maps is not an acceptable source at all. That's copyright infringement and if that was your source, we should probably revert that change. maxspeed=* should be reserved for the official speed limit.
|
|
| 61174169 | The Farm Bureau's a nonprofit organization, like the Automobile Association of America. Being somewhat familiar with Farm Bureau, this is very likely to be an insurance office.
|
|
| 61183486 | What was the point in splitting the loop?
|