OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
59948539

Doesn't look bad, but lanes shouldn't be used on laneless streets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539

59874377

This is still closed and under construction.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59874377

59874124

Wow, that was some sloppy geometry.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59874124

59854736

Close, but don't bind closed area edges to the road centerlines

59842222

Not sure how much interest you have in Oklahoma County, but I'm working on https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/11 right now.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59842222

59796231

The correct format for phone tags would be phone= 1-xxx-yyy-zzz, not (xxx) yyy-zzzz
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59796231

59791171

Kind of an OK start, but landuse should be for the full lot, not individual buildings (building=residential works for residential buildings).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59791171

59779952

1-918-258-7878 would be the correct format for phone tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59779952

59754704

Description covered it, no need to tag a name if it doesn't have a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59754704

59654504

JOSM makes changes a bit more clear, and if you're not sure what you just did, you can always bring up the undo/redo queue and step backwards and forwards. Also a lot more paint styles available to help visualize what your edit is about to do

59654504

Merging the segments completely smashed all the three segments tags together. Wondering if we found a weird edge case problem in id.

59675844

Understandable. Not having a population listed at all may be preferable until we can get a public domain or government source just so we don't run into licensing issues with Wikipedia.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59675844

59675844

Go to the Census, Wikipedia isn't a valid source for OpenStreetMap, they're not license compatible.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59675844

59675113

Getting pretty good with the geometry! If you're looking to move up to an editor that handles the kinds of edits you're doing a little easier, you might take a look at JOSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59675113

59663132

This is an inappropriate place to post ad copy. OpenStreetMap is not your personal spam site.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59663132

59654504

This was split intentionally for the turn lane tagging.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59654504

59599199

This may be a duplicate of Oklahoma Surgical Hospital.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59599199

59586763

This entire thing is Kohl's?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59586763

59546874

What's your source for this data, and what's the copyright?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59546874

59532014

Nice catch.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59532014