Fixed.

I don't think any part of it is a motorway anymore (again, expressways have ramps, too), but I do think all but the middle 3 stroad blocks are an expressway. It's basically Salem Parkway except unlike Salem Parkway, it never actually steps down into fitting its surroundings and integrating with its surroundings functionally any better than the freeway did.

Most of us are in agreement that this isn't a motorway. Also don't think it really does justice or brings anything useful or informative to the table to switch the highway=* value in the middle; all they did was take a freeway, remove most of the grade separation, and expect it to work better than Northwest Expressway does at being a surface street somehow.

It's also rather difficult to classify because I think most people would clearly consider EK Gaylord a more major street in terms of importants, possibly even Walker Ave, but highway=tertiary, expressway=yes also feels weird.

So, what exactly are we calling an expressway wearing a stroad tube top that barely covers three blocks now, if not this?

So, the thing is, I think most mappers are quite used to there being a level between motorway and trunk for all the weird expressway (and superstroad) type things like this, given that highway=trunk historically has meant expressway=yes in the US. I also think the sample size of who was consulted was likely too small if this is a situation that keeps happening.

I detected hostility because Elliott came into the thread hot and immediately flashes a badge at someone who's been working on OSM just as long and far more prolifically.

I have actually been up and down OKC Boulevard a few times; I do see the whole length as a single classification because it's pretty obvious that's what the intent was. If it wasn't OKC's intent, they shouldn't have signed off on that; they had the option of just having the freeway removed instead of converted to an expressway.

I did read the proposed classification above. I can't honestly see another classification that fits, given all but the middle couple blocks with the hotel and on-street parking are the only part that isn't full blown expressway. I am open to other suggestions, though not ones that involve classifying it as a motorway in any part. Expressways can and do regularly have grade separated intersections, too, and calling the western few blocks a motorway for it seems like troll tagging now that there's apparently an effort to obfuscate weird expressways from the map.

Also if everybody could assume good faith and dial back the hostility, that would be great and in-line with the CoC.

I don't think this is a surface street or a freeway, though. It's somewhere between the two. They literally bulldozed I 40 and replaced it with... a proto-freeway instead of something remotely sensible.

I've driven it myself and it feels a lot like an expressway to me, given the seamless flow from controlled access to limited access and back with no transition along the way, with only a couple blocks in the middle rather fitting a potential lower classification, but that seemed inconsistent with the rest of the road.

Motorway definitely isn't the right fit, but it definitely has a proto-freeway feel when taken as a whole, does it not?

No idea myself but if I had to guess, I would guess it connected to Lottie Avenue, since they're pointed at each other.

Did this entrance close?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134367433

You attached a parking garage lane's 4th floor to the 5th floor...layers are important. Please fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134349012

Oh, inside the city the default county speed limit could probably get popped off, along with its source tagging.

I have no idea which object you're referencing.

Wondering how BIA networks are handled or if we need to work this one out...since I presume we're talking about something signed with the BIA's arrowhead shields. Probably something like US:BIA:Choctaw for the relation?

I'd have to look elsewhere to see for sure but I think the abbreviation for indian routes is BIA on ref=* when tagging ways.

Hmm, this probably could be better classified, which tribe runs this route?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133844000

The move from destination to destination:street was definitely wrong in this case. These tags do mean two different things, and street names don't belong in destination=*.

A descriptive changeset comment would be greatly appreciated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133502740

OK, the southbound lanes of the freeway are just east and appear to already be tagged as open.

OK, I'm not *exactly* sure what happened, but what you changed the tagging on was very definitely a path and not an offramp, as offramps aren't usually 3 km long and 4m wide with 2m radius turns.

Landuse polygons generally shouldn't attach to road centerlines.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133455199

Where are you getting the idea that this multiuse path is 1) complete and 2) now a freeway onramp?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133456573