BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 38100196 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38100177 | No evidence of public vehicle use here |
|
| 38100133 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38100117 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38099995 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38099596 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38099562 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38099513 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38096332 | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish. |
|
| 38079101 | Hi, just wanted to let you know that the footpath does not join to Toot Hill Road to the south. Was it supposed to? |
|
| 37947615 | Hello there, well done on adding to OpenStreetMap and welcome to OSM. The data added was actually duplicated on the node (POI) and the building. I have taken the liberty of drawing the whole building and placing your data. Small tweaks to the data are phone number (+44 2083 051060 is usual OSM manner) and building level (level=0 is ground floor,) of shop.
|
|
| 37537619 | No response so node removed. |
|
| 37145665 | Hi, You have now duplicated the way alongside the river. There is now the original public footpath over which bicycles are allowed. Plus your new cycleway which you have not tagged for foot use. For a considerable length these two ways are on top of each other. Makes a real mess of routing! Is that path a shared use (foot and cycle) path? Would you like me to correct it for you. |
|
| 37145606 | Hi, You have now duplicated the way alongside the river. There is now the original public footpath over which bicycles are allowed. Plus your new cycleway which you have not tagged for foot use. For a considerable length these two ways are on top of each other. Makes a real mess of routing! Is that path a shared use (foot and cycle) path? Would you like me to correct it for you. |
|
| 37631901 | You must be mistaken it is a Public Footpath through fields. I have removed your new highway which in any case was a duplication. |
|
| 37705357 | I have removed the circles, but may I remark that your name is on two of the buildings. |
|
| 37705357 | Hello There, unfortunately you have inadvertently made two of the buildings in that block into circles. It would be best to revert the changes you made and start again. If you wish I can revert your changes for you and you can add agian your business. Or if you can tell me the position of your business I can add it for you. If I interpret correctly all blocks in that building where allocated, has a business ceased to operate? If so which one? Regards
|
|
| 37557926 | I 'm sorry, I hadn't refreshed my screen, I can now see you've removed the oneway. Many thanks! |
|
| 37557926 | I see I didn't make it clear, that I'm talking about the residential section not the secondary section of Sewardstone Road. |
|
| 37557926 | Hi, no disrespect intended but can you make a clearer statement? Is Sewardstone Road onewway? Or not? Or which part is oneway? I have made the section of Sewardstone Road between Bishops Way and Approach Way oneway going SE. |