Hi, barrier=stile feature should be connected to a way/path. Thus indicating the way/path that the stile is a barrier to.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have added your company POI in the middle of the street. I'm sure your office is not actually there, (it is actually at the other end of the road). Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

From your website it seems you are reluctant to give an actual address for the company. Thus the company's physical position cannot be determined from this POI, therefore it is not verifiable on the ground from this POI. Therefore the POI should be removed.

Hi, You forgot to tag Way: 413186334

Hi, You forgot to tag Way: 409785250

Hi, you have added your company POI in the middle of the street. I'm sure you office is not actually there. features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

From your website it seems you are reluctant to give an actual address for the company. Thus the company's physical position cannot be determined, therefore it is not verifiable on the ground. Therefore the POI should be removed.

What is wrong with giving the company's full details (address), surely there is nothing you would wish to hide? Or is it that you do not wish clients to know your whereabouts?

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The hotel you added to the map is not in the middle of the highway. Secondly it has already been mapped. I have therefore removed the duplication. Thanks very much for trying to add to the map, regards

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your additions don't make any sense, are you just seeing what happens?
Please be aware aware that this is a live worldwide map and such actions though they may be inadvertent disrupt the integrity of the OSM database. Your features should be deleted would you like me to do this for you? Regards
Bernard

Gate is now properly connected to the highway, thanks, well done.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice the gate you added is not attached to or part of the footway. Nor is it placed as a barrier to Spa Fields. As such it serves no real purpose in the database and will be ignored by routeing software. I see also you intended to show an access condition on the gate,(locked at night), this can be expressed with the tag "access:conditional@destination=sunrise-sunset"

Are you sure this is the correct position of the gate? If you need assistance please ask.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, we are a live map used by many people worldwide. This is not therefore a place to test things. I hope you can therefore understand that your test should be removed.
The feature does actually have a name anyway.

Hello there, welcome to OpenStreetMap, is the car rental really in the middle of Bristol Road? Is the name really . as stated? If not could you please either correct or remove the POI node.

man_made=tower
The tower will no show as you have tagged it. Correct tags are :-
man_made=tower
tower:type=communication

Please remove the tags :-
man_made_1
man_made_2
They serve no purpose.

Hello Robert, new mapper @_EY
changed a whole bunch of ways to BOATS, (he got his info from an old map source which could well have then correctly marked these ways as BOAT's or RUPP's). I emailed him pointing out the problems and we agreed that I revert all his changes. Unfortunately he had started to try and correct some himself. So I went through everything manually. I missed this one, sorry. I think everything else is now correct. I also tweaked lines and vehicle use.
Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your addition of Plazoleta Del Arroyo is incomplete as there is only a name, no description of the feature, the database thus does not recognize it as a feature. I removed the full stop from it.

I have reverted the addition of the untagged way and the way tagged as a El Circuito. These are duplication's along the route of RPE75. Being duplication's they are of no use to the OSM database and serve only to disrupt routing software.

Please take time to read up on OSM best practice in order that we may all have the best map in the world, thanks.

Hi, Welldone and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Just made the opening times fit OSM's method, added website and phone number.

Hello. If there is a physical well on the common then it is better described as a feature by the tag "man_made=well", this will convey the information to the rest of the world. If the well is named "Well" all well and good. But a description of the feature should not be used as its name.

There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Sallow Lane. Sallow Lane is designated by NCC definitive map as a "Public Footpath". There is no evidence that this section of way is named Sallow Way.

There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Hayntons Lane.

This is a byway restricted to use by foot and by horse. The surface is grass not bare ground. The restriction is to motorized traffic therefore vehicle=no is the tag, there may be agricultural vehicle use by the owner. It is thus a bridleway rather than a formal track. The NCC definitive map designation by order is Restricted Byway.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map". no public vehicle use here.

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.