BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 37570774 | Hi, from your website I think you have placed this POI in the wrong place. I have corrected the opening times to conform with OpenStreetMap practices. Regards |
|
| 37557926 | Is it really one way, I can't see anything to suggest this from Bishops way junction. |
|
| 37537619 | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
|
| 37432796 | Hi, I removed duplicate features. A few descriptive nodes inside of areas with the same description, (pub, hospital and car shop). |
|
| 37273085 | Hi, your change-set added numerous untagged ways duplicating existing ways. I think you must have inadvertently done this so I have reverted the additions. The map is now back as it was so no harm done. Please read up a bit before adding features to the map. Your editing is to a live map and it's very easy to mess things up. Were you intending to add a cottage to the map? If so can I assist in any way? Regards Bernard |
|
| 37191391 | Hi, There are now two outlines for the park, and one outline duplicates itself by going round twice. so in fact three circuits of the park in total. May I also suggest that the park does not extend to the center line of the surrounding roads and that it should be mapped to it's physical boundary. Regards. |
|
| 37169742 | Don't know if reverting is possible in iD editor so I've reverted the deletion in with the JOSM editor.
|
|
| 37169742 | Hi, The building is still there so there was no need to remove it. Someone might come along and put it back. So the best thing to do is remove all detail specific to the business and then put on a note=vacant tag or note=music shop closed now shop unknown. |
|
| 37108674 | Many Thanks, looks good now. |
|
| 37108674 | There are many added ways mostly duplicated and untagged. A lot connecting to existing features. Unfortunately I have made a couple of corrections before realising the extent of the problem. Would it be best to revert this changeset? Not by me as there are to many conflicts. |
|
| 37023460 | Can the Dream Shed be verified on the ground by anyone visiting the site? If not then it should not be included on OSM.
|
|
| 36604305 | With respect, moorland should be tagged as moorland, and not be tagged as heath to suit the renderer even if it looks wrong. To do such tagging is to corrupt the database. |
|
| 36691361 | ||
| 36691361 | Please don't forget this is a live map and not really the place to test out ideas. There is already a Crossrail route relation :- #2956938 |
|
| 25145736 | Just found out again that I can't reply to the email notification, should be a warning!!
By the way Morningthorpe Green is open access land, I've just been trying to determine if the access land goes over to include this track.
|
|
| 36622471 | Hi, correct.
|
|
| 36622471 | second test |
|
| 36622471 | Test comment |
|
| 36550390 | Hi, the northern of the two features, Way: 391197182 just tagged as area, outline also has self intersection.
|
|
| 36570356 | Hi, are the tags on Way: 238287403 correct? I wondered why a helipad was included in a highway=footway area. |