Hi Jack Boschert,
yes, you are right, this is the duplicate, I will remove it, I was adding some missing roads and somehow created a duplicate, sorry. Good catch, thanks for notice.

Hi jabal2017,
your edit broke the relation of Sidon relation/14889636

Can you please fix this?

Hi, Abedul Bouleau,
can you fix
relation/14701561
and
relation/14701559

both relations are not closed

Hi,
can you finish the relations:
relation/15881727 - Wierzbowo
relation/15881729 - Szulmierz
relation/15881730 - Kołaki-Kwasy

I do not get any data from the Geoportal so I can not finish them by myself.

Thanks,
Aleksandar Matejevic

Thanks for pointing this out. I have fixed this one also

I have reverted the changeset where the wrong name was added.

Nice job. Thanks!!!

Can you please fix Srinagar (North) and Srinagar (South) relations?

Srinagar (North) (10389874, v11)
Srinagar (South) (10389875, v11)

Are you sure this boundary should be deleted, this broke WA State relation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wa_State

Lazare, otvorio si deonicu Pojate - Mekrešane, ali nije povezana na putnu mrežu. Možeš li to da središ?

Hi, I see a lot of unexisting ways and untagged ways, can you fix this or explain why you have added them?

Thanks for fixing these, but still info for the devil1cal to be more careful and try not to delete things

You have broken a lot of relations. Can you please fix them or revert your changeset since it crated a lot of damage

Can you verify that admin_level should be 5 since it is updated to a city, but this area is still under relation/6555245.

Do you think Miyan Joleg County should remain admin_level=6 even if it is updated to a city? If not, can you fix the boundaries so they do not overlap, and add admin_level=6 missing ones?

Sorry, there were a lot of broken boundaries to fix and I did that one by mistake. It was unintentional. I have corrected it back to IBGE:GEOCODIGO.
Thanks for pointing this out.

Also Pagu and please check all unfinished ones, please

Can you fix Gurah admin boundaries?

Thanks. Happy mapping.

Can you please fix relations that are broken by this changeset:
relation/11066102 - Kifri Central Subdistrict,
relation/15577657 - Central Kfri Subdistrict,
relation/15577658 - Sarqala Subdistrict,
relation/11066101 - Sarqala Subdistrict,
relation/11066103 - Kokis Subdistrict

OK, I can see where the confusion is coming from. Please do not use census data for this. Census polygons classification is based on how many residents are there, not looking at the function of the place itself. Ražanj is a town with a low population, but it is the administrative center of the municipality, so it is a town by functionality, but it has a very low population.