Hi,
viaduct is a bridge composed of several small spans for crossing a valley or a gorge. This is not a viaduct, so can you fix the bridge tag on 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü

Thanks for response. We can remove source:type and description tags once you make a decision about the further actions, so you do not need to work on this

Hi AlexLabrada,
why have you removed administrative boundary tags from the Isla de la Juventud

Hi Taya,
please reconsider your decision of reverting all these edits since our team have not done any of the imports and we were focused on fixing natural=coastline items in a way that we created or assigned names to an existing coastline or lakes using rendering on Greenland Topographic Map which is available source in JOSM. I do not see the need for reverting something that really exist on the ground. I do agree that using undiscussed source is a problem, but that is more on user andershl to be discussed with. We have seen discussion on his diary @andershl/diary/48132 where woodpeck had remark: The data can be useful - put it in a shape file, and everyone can load it in their editor and copy names to osm FROM THE SHAPEFILE instead of from imported nodes.

This is why using data was never questioned.

I would suggest to you first to revert all the changes to original state. Then, discuss with Turkmenistan and OSM community about what you suggest has sense. If agreement is achieved, edit boundary=administrative wiki page with agreed admin_level descriptions. Then, move all existing relations to corresponding levels and then introduce new ones. Currently there is an overlap of administrative areas across the country, which is a bad thing. I would like to jump in and help you with edits on the map once agreement is made.

I see that you have added a lot of admin_level=6 relations, but these should be admin_level=8 or 9 per boundary=administrative

Can you explain why using admin_level=6?

I think that Hong Kong Island node can not be admin_center but label of Hong Kong, and node of the city should have admin_center role because it is always a place which have administrative body controlling the area

Hi Kovoschiz, can you explain the need for admin_level=4 relation here?

Hi, what is the goal of this? Is there any description of how to tag this nodes to coastlines?

Hi eiriks, just take care when you draw the coastlines, they need to be drawn counterclockwise. natural=coastline

How can admin_level=6 of Macau be a part of admin_level=6 of China? You have put Hengqin Port Transportation Hub Platform as a part of Macau, and therefore it should be excluded from Xiangzhou

Hi, distrito boundaries are now broken, can you fix this?

Hi Rukkhadevata, can you answer to the 蕉饼电脑 comment since I have very similar question?

There is a Pingtan boundary present at admin_level=6 relation/3263974. This one is de-jure boundary. If you wanted this admin_level=5 to be de-facto I think boundary=administrative is not a proper tag. You should, maybe, use boundary=special_economic_zone if there are some different laws applied for this area. Current tagging is making overlap on admin_level=5 administrative boundary type which is the worst solution applied.

You have changed the admin_level value, and now you have an overlap with Fuzhou City. Either remove Pingtan from Fuzhou City or lower the admin_level value back to original one.

Thanks for clearimg this one for me and for the article, always nice to learn something new. Happy mapping!

Hi, why have you changed the name:en for Mount Taranaki?

Hi homesteadrv,
I see that you have added lot numbers for The Board Walk Mobile Home Park. It looks like lot 706 way/522608062 is on the wrong building. This one should be 707, and 709 is missing, so you might have made a mistake here form 701 to 710. Per this map https://boardwalkrv.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Map-1.jpg it looks like you have started 701 where is a lot 702. Can you please double check this and update?

The difference is that Crimea had some voting about annexation in 2014, there are some legal documents in which Russia recognizes Crimea as its part, and Russia has full control of it, while for the rest of Ukraine territories, they are under occupation, not recognized by Russia also, it is ongoing war.

Crimea and Kosovo are the similar things. Legally, Kosovo is part of Serbia, it is not recognized as separate country by UN and majority of the countries, however, it is mapped as separate country. Why? On the ground situation is that this part of Serbia has its own self claimed separatist administration. That is why Crimea can be mapped as part of Russia, while other territories of Ukraine cant. It is who controls them administratively. Claiming and disputing are present all arround the world.

Hi Flap Slimy Outward,
your claim does not stand, it is not the same situation. Please revert borders of Russia to the previous state.