same with all the other service roads here. and why did you delete the drop-off road?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106155990

You have added oneway=yes to way/951815810. On Maxar Premium Imagery, you can see the road markings that show that this is a two way road. Why did you change it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106155990

you have changed a building into a landuse feature. This is not correct. Buildings are used to map the outline of buildings. Landuse features cover the grounds. This is an example of a well-mapped church: osm.org/#map=19/-36.79870/174.77796 the grounds have landuse=religious and the building has building=yes + other descriptive tags
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106154241

You've been asked many times in other changesets not to tag walkways as bicycle=designated. This path is not signposted as a "Cycleway" or "Shared Path", and there are barriers to prevent cycling. This is definitely not a designated cycle path.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106148805

"Can I name it path?" - No, you cannot add fake or made-up names to OSM. If there no official name, nor a signposted name, the 'name' field should be blank.

You've said that "these paths are intended for use by both cyclists and pedestrians" - unless you have seen a sign that says 'Cycleway' or 'Shared path', then it is not designated for cycling.

In fact, street level imagery suggests the opposite: there are barriers to prevent cycling - see https://storage11.openstreetcam.org/files/photo/2019/2/7/lth/1338069_6_e7c20_46.jpg which means it is definitely not a designated cycle path

you have been using the tag 'bicycle=designated'. Please carefully read the documentation for this tag: bicycle=designated

it should only be used if it the path is explicitly signposted as a "Shared Path" or "Cycleway" (these are the words used in New Zealand).

also, do not add fake or made-up names to OSM, "informal" and "Orford park paths" are not the official names of these walkways, nor are there any signposts that say that.

could you explain where you got the name "Walpole Avenue Reserve Path" from please? You must not make up names. We can only include signposted names or official names in OSM.

also, why did you delete the residential area around this park?

just because there are no signs, doesn't mean you can tag it as bicycle=designated. That tag should only be used if it is 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 as a cycle path. That means there are signs that say "Shared Path" or "Cycleway". In this case it should not be tagged as a cycleway

the 'name' tag is for just the name, not the description or purpose (Sports Park). Please read osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

The name of this park is not "Gallaher,Sports Park". That is neither the official name, nor how it is signposted. Please do not add fake or made-up names to OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106070218

Hi this edit is totally wrong, you cannot walk or cycle (or drive) on these paths. The only way to access them is from the motorway. It is illegal to walk or cycle on the motorway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105938884

why did you change the name of a walking track to "Everglade Drive"? This is not correct. (way/67327897)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105940754

do not add fake or made-up names to OSM
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105946787

Do not add fake names to OSM. According to LINZ the name of this creek is Oira Creek, not "Eastern Karaka Creeks", nor "West Karaka Creeks"
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105946879

This mud covers a much larger area than just the Puhinui Creek, so it is not correct to add name=Puhinui Creek

See relation/3005500
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105947001

What is the source of the name 'Adams walkway'? Do not add made-up names to OSM
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105954239

Hi, is the sidewalk on Ronwood Ave actually signposted as a "Shared Path"? If not, it should not be tagged as a cycleway. It is actually illegal to cycle on the footpath unless it is signposted as a shared path...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105913063

Please do not create fake buildings that don't exist. And don't put your description in the 'name' field
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105915838

Hi, what is the source of the name 'Cotton Spinney'? Also 'Kokuora pond'? Kokuora seems to be a region in Russia.... Please do not add fake names to OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105920848

Hi, what is your source for the name change? the official name of the park seems to be Puhinui Reserve (see https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/parks-recreation/Pages/park-details.aspx?Location=374)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105902483