fixed in changeset/161935139

sorry about this... the Level0 editor has a limit of 500 features per edit, so it looks like the editor lost all my changes except the first 500 nodes 🤦 I've cleaned this up now in changeset/161934838

hey, way/1333424683 still has no tags, do you remember what this was supposed to be?

no worries, I can check it with an automated script next week, which will be a lot more efficient

See https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7780

Q5617739 was the correct ID until 2023 when that ID was repurposed.

It's a bit annoying, but apparently spliting by country is required for https://alltheplaces.xyz

re. second and third comments: "weren't worth realigning" is a tricky topic, I also find the validator warnings annoying, but deleting them causes further issues, for example disconnected segments of waterways. https://waterwaymap.org is normally a nice way to visualize this.

I quite like the approach you've done in subsequent changesets, I would suggest that method going forward

re. your first question: your changeset is too big to use any of the standard tools, unfortunately the only method I know is manually clicking on the ways listed below this chatbox

nice to hear that you've been in touch in Bryan, I think there's an update coming soon to Rapid's crossing validator. but unfortunately it'll take a lot longer to get these features into iD...

Hi, I checked 20 of the deleted ways and they all seem to exist.... Some of them have also been refined by other mappers since the original import.

If the creekbed appears dry, that might be because the aerial imagery was caputered in summer, and it would be more appropriate to add intermittent=yes instead of deleting it

okay, maybe it's fine as is. It felt a bit weird, but I guess having a direction makes sense

should we also add oneway=no ? iD assumes that waterway=flowline implies oneway=yes: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/10283 but these are all tidal bays

not your fault. thanks for tidying this up. most of this stuff was mapped 8 years ago when there was no hi-res imagery

perfect, thanks for updating these :)

sounds good, man_made=tunnel is the only other opinion I can think of , but its also not perfect

thanks for the quick response, I think the notes are confused since there are 3 similar ones at this location. I've restored the bus stop for now

Hi, you have been setting the 'operator' tag on many businesses to values that could potentially be peoples' names.

Could you please confirm that this data is not private information? OpenStreetMap is a public database; please see osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for further info

Hi, what source did you use for this edit? (apart from the osm note)

Every transit app that I checked shows that this stop still exists and the 324 bus stops here

hey, you can check https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/50772 to see the exact extent of the 'Defence Purpose' land

sorry no one replied to this, what you've done with relation/17011117 is perfect. In OSM, the relation just needs a wikidata ID. Wikidata itself does not need to be updated. Then after a few days you can add {{Maplink|frame=yes|https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type=line}} to the wikipedia page, and the relation will magically appear.

done: node/8294953574

it's a bit confusing because waterfalls are only allowed as vertices, not standalone points.

So the editor won't let you plonk a waterfall anywhere, you have to first select a point along a stream/river