❤️🔥's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160811592 | Hi, why are you removing tags like tracktype ? |
|
| 159307907 | Does this circlular feature exist in reality? It seems to duplicate node/12346604162 |
|
| 161139710 | Hi, several people have asked you to stop deleting precicely mapped landuse. See changeset/110602955 and changeset/128320877 and changeset/128750531 May I ask why you've started deleting other people's work again? I see you were doing this last year as well... |
|
| 115923904 | on that topic, I see you've added two bays called Island Bay, do you know which one is correct? |
|
| 115923904 | according to the NZGB, Te Motu Tohorā is the other island: https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/55500 this island has no recorded name in the NZGB |
|
| 152747580 | hmm that's really weird, thanks for fixing it. no idea how it happened... |
|
| 160385268 | I just found out that this area will be returned to its original dilapidated state after the event finishes......... so maybe it wasn't worth mapping the construction |
|
| 156773988 | cool thanks for the detailed explanation, feel free to make any changes you need , apologies again for the inconvenience |
|
| 156773988 | hey, my apologies, previously most ferry routes were just set to Wharf 5 which wasn't correct either... So in this changeset I moved the ferry routes to their usual* wharfs, rather than Wharf 5. and also cleaning up and deleting very old data (e.g. the F4 doesn't go to Rose Bay anymore, F7 and F9 were mixed up, MFF route was broken, etc) but unfortunately OSM's data model for PTv2 routes requires you to pick an arbitrary platform/wharf, so it can never be perfectly modelled... are there any specific things that need to be fixed to help TfNSW's use case? |
|
| 158603019 | Hi, cars are allowed to drive here if they're accessing the Sydney Water carpark |
|
| 158111713 | Hi, there's a sidewalk on this bridge.... Are you sure you edited the correct feature? |
|
| 160185742 | I'd hope that by next summer the construction here will be finished, but who knows. I guess we can decide in 5 months when it closes |
|
| 160185742 | good point, thanks for fixing it andrew. I'll check the signage next time I walk past, in case there's more accurate dates |
|
| 159981057 | Hi, please don't ignore validator warnings. And may I ask why you deleted part of the defence area? |
|
| 159932593 | awesome thanks :) |
|
| 159932593 | Hi, did you intentionally remove Goat Island from the Port Jackson relation? See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/15522136 The result is that the island appears underwater |
|
| 159444047 | Hi, if you're going to merge address nodes with buildings, it's much more efficient to hold down `Shift`, then click on the node & the building, and then press `C` on your keyboard This also prevents existing tags from being deleted, like addr:suburb |
|
| 159305760 | I think the wording on priority=* just needs to be fixed to match the other wiki pages. oneway=alternating is a well established tag and it's used on over 2000 one-lane-bridges you're right that the literal meaning of the word 'oneway' seems wrong, but this is a common problem in OSM, see here for more info: osm.wiki/Counterintuitive_keys_and_values |
|
| 159305760 | Hi, why is oneway=alternating "incorrect"? This seems like a perfect example of oneway=alternating according to the documentation: oneway=alternating |
|
| 158999739 | Hi, merging 22 and 22A into the same building is less precise than having two nodes in the exact location. If you know the exact boundary between the two units, then you could split the building area, e.g. way/1316654484 |