since i didn't hear back from you I've removed the tag

Hey, what source are you using for elevation? According to the background imagery "LINZ NZ Topo50 Gridless Maps", the elevation is 152 metres. LINZ is the source used for almost all elevations in NZ

a second source also says "over 148 metres": https://mustdonewzealand.co.nz/tours/hole-in-the-rock-bay-of-islands-2022/

thanks

moin, danke für ihre edits. wenn fußgänger und radfahrer beide den weg benutzen dürfen, dann ist es besser wenn wir die option "Rad- und Fußweg" wählen, statt "Pfad". die option für "Rad- und Fußweg" gibt es nicht in Deutschland, aber in NZ können wir es benutzen. deisen beispeil habe ich gerade geupdated

Hi, you might want to take a look at these 7 site relations. They have conflicting information in the ref/name tag...

relation/16422042 - 0161 or 0160 ?
relation/16455322 - 1091 or 0224 ?
relation/16478319 - 0298 or 0290 ?
relation/16478432 - 0295 or 0294 ?
relation/16492643 - 0906 or 0347 ?
relation/16952716 - 1084 or 1083 ?
relation/16551610 - 1830 or 1890 ?

sorry... i don't have a clue how to fix that efficiently but I'll take a look. I can understand why the ways might be out of order, but based on a visual inspection of relation/14309095 and relation/2666822, i don't see any gaps...

also added some flags and power outlets in this changeset

hey, what's the meaning of upload=false? see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GeV

thanks for adding the park, I've just refined the boundary to match the land parcels

Hey, I noticed this edit since you clicked "request review". Everything looks perfect, nice work :)

The wikipedia integration is a bit inconsistent, so if this change doesn't work you might need to create a "relation" so that wikipedia notices it (e.g. relation/16269661)

oops, fixed

hey, I assume you're talking about way/270742026/history ?

I have no idea why that's tagged as a `airfield=military`... might be worth asking on the original changeset: changeset/21429617

hey, sorry I don't have a photo but there's some info on this website: https://hudsonriverpark.org/activities/interim-pickleball-courts - as you noted, there's no aerial imagery yet so the size & position might be a bit off. apologies if that's the case

thanks for fixing this and taking the time to explain!

should Redfern and Blacktown be mapped the same way, since they have some platforms that are similarly far from the other platforms? The inconsistency is what confused me

hi, in sydney there is normally 1 stop_area relation per train station. In this changeset I merged the two (incomplete) relations into a single relation: relation/9802366

this was based on advice from the OSM wiki, and the tagging style used at other stations in nsw.

apologies if this is incorrect. could you please help me understand why this station needs two seperate stop_area relations?

sorry, those screenshots are from OSM Americana, for `NZ:WRR` they use the ref from the route relation (which used to work perfectly because the ref was `WR`) - https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana/blob/3b73ce2/src/js/shield_defs.js#L3617

I guess the best solution is to design a proper svg shield, then the ref tag will be irrelevant for this scenario

hey, in this changeset did you intend to change the route shield from https://github.com/osmus/osmcha-frontend/assets/16009897/3a30f81b-5708-4c71-93ca-27d1222966a5 to https://github.com/osmus/osmcha-frontend/assets/16009897/091574aa-e220-4779-a760-ba474fdc3dbf ? I agree that "WRR" makes more sense when rendered in plaintext, but the original shield seems like a closer approximation to the actual symbol (https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3254090/182264785-4daee18f-ce5f-4a19-86ca-c474d572a22e.png )

not sure why the future CRL platforms are now visible. I don't think i edited them in this changeset

Hey, according to the linked wikidata item, this hill is genuinely called "peak"
- https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q31452031
- https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/35799
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Peak,_New_Zealand

hey, your recent edits look great. One minor thing, for traffic lights, can you please split the crossings at each kerb. Routing tools apply a time penalty for each crossing where pedestrians have to wait. However, this line way/1223624518 makes it look like you can walk diagonally in a single traffic light phase. So the estimated walking time will be a bit inaccurate.

It's not a big deal at all, but if you're going to map heaps of crossings, it would be nice to do it the official way. This would also allow other users to add accessibility info using mobile apps like StreetComplete.

osm.org/edit#map=20/-36.86388/174.76098 is a good example, where crossings are split at each kerb