hey, the colours are used on the signposts at bus stops, on timetables, brochures, and network maps and wayfinding at the big bus interchanges. The colours I added might not be exactly the same as what AT uses but I think having an approximate colour is still useful

Hi, what is your source for this edit? This street-level imagery from 2019 shows that the speed limit is 60 through the junction: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=3acff657-5de0-4c96-a467-8d09ac863908&cp=-37.196688%7E175.552607&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-2.2&style=x&dir=168.6

Has the speed limit recently been raised from 60 to 100?

hey, nice work. when mapping curbs (or cliffs), the arrows should be on the lower side. I've corrected a few along great north road, you may want to review any other ones that you added

p.s. you might find it easier to map kerbs as a single long line, and add the "raised/lowered" info using points. this method is more widely supported, and allows mobile apps like StreetComplete to prompt users to add accessibility info.

here's an example: osm.org/edit#map=21/-36.84503/174.76803

perfect, thanks for confirming

Hey, thanks for your edit. Just wondering what source you used for this name change? LINZ says this is called "Pitt Road", and the businesses along this road use "Pitt Road" as their address (e.g. https://theplantmarket.co.nz/contact-us )

I'm curious because I can't find any information online about "Aintree Way". Cheers

I'm not sure what the comment above means. I have reverted this in changeset/142305155

Hey, thanks for the reply, what you've done so far with route=bicycle looks good, one thing to note is that there should be a single route-relation for the whole route, rather than many route-relations which each have one member.

If these routes have a name that's even better, but I don't think that's a strict requirement.

Another thing to keep in mind is that some navigation software doesn't allow bicycle along "footways" or "footpaths" because cycling on the footpath is illegal. The solution would be to add `bicycle=yes` or tag the path as a "Shared Path" if there is an explicit sign (e.g. osm.wiki/File:New_Zealand_road_sign_R4-11.svg ).

In this case, the footbridge would ideally have `bicycle=yes` or be changed to a "Shared Path" if cycling is officially allowed. Otherwise some validation tools will flag this as an error, since a bicycle route can't include a path where bikes are banned

hey if you want to include a portion of the stream beyond the coastline you can map it as `waterway=tidal_channel` - see way/987561246 for a local example and waterway=tidal_channel for the docs

Hey, you requested a review on a few of your earlier edits - I haven't looked at everything but what I did check looks great. The main thing to consider (which you seem to have noticed) is that wikidata tags for streams/roads should go on a relation, rather than the individual segments. thanks for your work!

Hey, in OSM a "bicycle route" is meant to be for long distance signposted routes, rather than a single path or road. check out route=bicycle for more info.

Maybe what you're looking for is `bicycle=yes`, which tells software that bikes are allowed on this path?

thanks, railway:signal:speed_limit_distant is exactly what i was looking for. I've upated the note and removed `maxspeed:ahead`

Hey, sorry I'm not that familiar with tagging railway signs. There is a speed limit sign here (40km/h) and below it is a "90km/h ahead" sign. The equivilant road sign would be osm.wiki/File:MUTCD_W3-5.svg or osm.wiki/File:MUTCD_W3-5A.svg So should we use `maxspeed:advisory` here instead of `maxspeed:ahead`?

Hi, what source did you use for this edit? On mapillary imagery, the speed limit is 80km/h: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=273663704494371&focus=photo

I belive the speed limit was changed 5 years ago. See https://nzta.govt.nz/projects/sh60-speed-limit-consultation

i can confirm that the signage at the airport uses the 4-digit codes: https://westnordost.de/p/172643.jpg

Hi, the speed limit is not 99 km/h here...

Hi, this edit is also not correct

Hi, I don't think this edit is correct. See https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-daily-post/news/new-speed-limits-set-for-state-highway-30-tikitere-to-whakatane/PL6GBKLCZNBQFALLYHHK2BBYLI/

you also appear to have changed the road name instead of the speed limit

Hey, I suspect you're correct. However I'm not a local, in this changeset I just added the tag `service=busway` to the existing roads

oh no need to revert, any extra detail is more than welcome! sorry , i assumed you were trying to fix an existing routing issue at that intersectionn

hey, this turn restriction is already modelled correctly in OSM, see relation/14423165 and relation/14423164

maybe the software that you're using doesn't understand `except=bicycle` ?