thanks for your edits! local knowledge is much appreciated, there aren't many people mapping around Hamilton

thanks!

great, thanks for taking the time to fix this

thanks for fixing one of the issues, but it seems like most of the bridges you editted have been dragged, including the ones from the other changeset(s?)

for example, the one linked in my comment above is still broken

Hi, someone has put a lot of effort into precisely mapping different landuse areas. Why have you deleted all these areas? the huge new residential area that you've drawn around the whole suburb includes parks, shops, sports fields and churches, which are definietly not "residential"

Hi, please see comments on changeset/128194856 this changeset also broke a footway: way/393909157

I would fix this myself, but iD doesn't let you edit it because it has overlapping geometry

Hi, you seem to have dragged a node 20km north, which has broken this footway way/340785580

it's hard to review this changeset for other issues because its too big for software like OsmCha. but your other changeset has a similar issue

thanks, I wasn't sure if it counts as a fender since the wiki page says that tag can't be used on nodes - seamark:shoreline_construction:category=fender

hey, what's the correct way of tagging that a pile or post is padded with rubber tyres?

it looks a bit like this: https://flic.kr/p/4SSyKv

thanks for fixing this, interesting to know about the maproulette UI... i was just scrolling thru osmcha for NZ looking for one of my own edits :)

this area is within an existing parking lot, i think the proper fix is to delete it or split it into individual parking spaces?

this area is within an existing parking lot, i think the proper fix is to delete it or split it into individual parking spaces?

cool, no problem - the address import tool noticed this so I've deleted the duplicates

Hi, addresses should only go on the main building, they shouldn't be duplicated on sheds or garages

yep, fixed :)

Hi, i've fixed the direction. you can do this by right clicking the line and then clicking "Reverse". Or, select the line and click `v` on your keyboard

der amenity=post_box habe ich entfernt, es ist sehr unwahrscheinlich dass es ein briefkasten auf diesen neuseeländischer feldweg gibt

/

I've removed the amenity=post_box because it's quite unlikely that it exists there

sorry! i was going to return to survey the actual track layout but didn't get a a chance in the end... i see you've figured out the new route thru Clyde Station, thanks for fixing this

p.s. is it better to leave a gap in the route relations in situations like this? or leave the whole area alone and add an OSM note?

Hi, sorry most of this edit was based on a survey around the Lilyfield lightrail depot. I saw two large structures from the A4, which I assumed were the temporary roofs visible in bing aerial imagery. that was my mistake, i'll be more careful in the future...

Thanks for fixing this. As far as I know, there's no easy way to tell which imagery is the newest. Sometimes you can figure it out from the history of OSM features....